Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Darden Vs. Florida

Darden vs Florida

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Apr-19-1977
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/104224

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
430 U.S. 704
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Darden

Respondent

Florida

Excerpt

darden v. florida - 430 u.s. 704 (1977) u.s. supreme court darden v. florida, 430 u.s. 704 (1977) 430 u.s. 704 darden v. florida certiorari to the supreme court of florida no. 76-5382. argued march 28, 1977 decided april 19, 1977 certiorari dismissed. reported below: 329 so.2d 287. geoffrey m. kalmus argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner. richard w. prospect, assistant attorney general of florida, argued the cause for respondent. with him on the brief was robert l. shevin, attorney general. per curiam. the writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted. mr. justice brennan, with whom mr. justice marshall joins, dissents and, adhering to his view that capital punishment is in all circumstances prohibited as cruel and unusual punishment by the eighth and fourteenth amendments, would set aside the death sentence imposed in this case. page 430 u.s. 704, 705

Full Judgment

DARDEN v. FLORIDA - 430 U.S. 704 (1977)
U.S. Supreme Court DARDEN v. FLORIDA, 430 U.S. 704 (1977) 430 U.S. 704

DARDEN v. FLORIDA
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

No. 76-5382.

Argued March 28, 1977
Decided April 19, 1977

Certiorari dismissed. Reported below: 329 So.2d 287.

Geoffrey M. Kalmus argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner.

Richard W. Prospect, Assistant Attorney General of Florida, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Robert L. Shevin, Attorney General.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN, with whom MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL joins, dissents and, adhering to his view that capital punishment is in all circumstances prohibited as cruel and unusual punishment by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, would set aside the death sentence imposed in this case.

Page 430 U.S. 704, 705



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial