Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Balvant Singh Vs. Jageshwar Singh

Balvant Singh vs Jageshwar Singh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Oct 16, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1042149

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Balvant Singh

Advocate Smt. Alka Singh

Respondent

Jageshwar Singh

Advocate Shri. D.P.Patel

Excerpt

w.p.no.341/2009 16.10.2012 smt. alka singh, learned counsel for the petitioners.shri d.p.patel, learned counsel for the respondent. although this matter is listed today for consideration of ia no.6650/09, respondent's application for vacating the exparte stay granted earlier but the petitioners.counsel seeks short adjournment for further preparation of the matter to make her submission in the matter. respondent's counsel has seriously opposed the adjournment saying that on some earlier occasion the coordinate bench of this court has directed to list this matter for final hearing in the month of february 2010, vide order dated 9.12.2009. on perusing such order sheet, i have found that while disposing of the application of the respondent for vacating exparte stay such direction was given by the coordinate bench of this court and in such premises, the aforesaid second application, i.e.ia no.6650/09 for vacating exparte stay is not sustainable as laid down by the apex court in the matter of satyadhyan ghosal and others versus smt. deorajin debi and another reported in air 196.sc 941. so such ia is hereby dismissed. however, keeping in view the order dated 9.12.2009, office is directed to list this matter by fixing a date on any tuesday or on thursday in the month of november or december 2012 for final argument. the interim order passed on 4.6.2009 is hereby continued till next hearing of this petition. (u.c.maheshwari) judge bks

Full Judgment

W.P.No.341/2009 16.10.2012 Smt.

Alka Singh, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri D.P.Patel, learned counsel for the respondent.

Although this matter is listed today for consideration of IA No.6650/09, respondent's application for vacating the exparte stay granted earlier but the petitioneRs.counsel seeks short adjournment for further preparation of the matter to make her submission in the matter.

Respondent's counsel has seriously opposed the adjournment saying that on some earlier occasion the Coordinate Bench of this court has directed to list this matter for final hearing in the month of February 2010, vide order dated 9.12.2009.

On perusing such order sheet, I have found that while disposing of the application of the respondent for vacating exparte stay such direction was given by the Coordinate Bench of this court and in such premises, the aforesaid second application, i.e.IA No.6650/09 for vacating exparte stay is not sustainable as laid down by the Apex Court in the matter of Satyadhyan Ghosal and others versus Smt.

Deorajin Debi and another reported in AIR 196.SC 941.

So such IA is hereby dismissed.

However, keeping in view the order dated 9.12.2009, office is directed to list this matter by fixing a date on any Tuesday or on Thursday in the month of November or December 2012 for final argument.

The interim order passed on 4.6.2009 is hereby continued till next hearing of this petition.

(U.C.Maheshwari) Judge bks

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial