Prem Narayan Dixit Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Prem Narayan Dixit vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Oct 16, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1042145

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1042145
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Oct 16, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Prem Narayan Dixit

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

prem narayan dixit versus state of mp and others 16.10.2012. shri awadesh gupta for the petitioner. shri sanjeev kumar singh, panel lawyer, for the state on advance notice. petitioner is working as assistant teacher in government primary school kachiya khera, district tikamgarh and has been transferred to government primary school, matoli in the same district. challenge to the order of transfer is made mainly on the ground that it is contrary to the transfer policy and if the transfer is given effect to the student teacher ratio would be adversely affected and, therefore, the transfer is unsustainable. the aforesaid grounds are to be considered by the competent authority and a decision taken. representation in this regard is already pending with the competent authority. accordingly, for the present without entering into the controvers.on merits, the competent authority of the department is directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law by a speaking order within four weeks. till the aforesaid exercise is not completed, status quo in the matter as is existing today shall be maintained. with the aforesaid, the petition stands disposed of. certified copy as per rules. (rajendra menon) judge aks/-

Full Judgment

Prem Narayan Dixit versus State of MP and others 16.10.2012.

Shri Awadesh Gupta for the petitioner.

Shri Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Panel Lawyer, for the State on advance notice.

Petitioner is working as Assistant Teacher in Government Primary School Kachiya Khera, District Tikamgarh and has been transferred to Government Primary School, Matoli in the same District.

Challenge to the order of transfer is made mainly on the ground that it is contrary to the transfer policy and if the transfer is given effect to the student teacher ratio would be adversely affected and, therefore, the transfer is unsustainable.

The aforesaid grounds are to be considered by the competent authority and a decision taken.

Representation in this regard is already pending with the competent authority.

Accordingly, for the present without entering into the controveRs.on merits, the competent authority of the department is directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law by a speaking order within four weeks.

Till the aforesaid exercise is not completed, status quo in the matter as is existing today shall be maintained.

With the aforesaid, the petition stands disposed of.

Certified copy as per rules.

(RAJENDRA MENON) JUDGE Aks/-

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties Prem Narayan Dixit vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education