Khet Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Khet Singh vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Oct 16, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1042124

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1042124
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Oct 16, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Khet Singh

Advocate Shri. Mahendra Pateriya

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

khet singh versus state of m.p.& ors.writ petition no.17318 ”16. 10.2012: shri mahendra pateriya, learned counsel for the petitioner. shri piyush dharmadhikari, learned government advocate for respondent/state. petitioner is working as panchayat secretary in gram panchayat jhapan, tahsil district damoh and vide order dated 29.9.2012 he has been transferred to gram panchayat bairagarh janpad panchayat tendukheda. petitioner claims to be more than 50% handicapped and, therefore, challenge is made to the order of transfer. merely on the ground that handicap of the petitioner has not been considered and transfer is made contrary to transfer policy, which gives certain protection to a handicapped person, and taking note of the aforesaid ground of transfer it is thought appropriate to direct the competent authority to decide the representation of the petitioner within a period 4 weeks. till the aforesaid exercise is not completed petitioner is permitted to work in his present place of posting. the petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid. certified copy as per rules. (rajendra menon) judge ss/-

Full Judgment

Khet Singh versus State of M.P.& ORS.Writ Petition No.17318 ”

16. 10.2012: Shri Mahendra Pateriya, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Shri Piyush Dharmadhikari, learned Government Advocate for respondent/State.

Petitioner is working as Panchayat Secretary in Gram Panchayat Jhapan, Tahsil District Damoh and vide order dated 29.9.2012 he has been transferred to Gram Panchayat Bairagarh Janpad Panchayat Tendukheda.

Petitioner claims to be more than 50% handicapped and, therefore, challenge is made to the order of transfer.

Merely on the ground that handicap of the petitioner has not been considered and transfer is made contrary to transfer policy, which gives certain protection to a handicapped person, and taking note of the aforesaid ground of transfer it is thought appropriate to direct the competent authority to decide the representation of the petitioner within a period 4 weeks.

Till the aforesaid exercise is not completed petitioner is permitted to work in his present place of posting.

The petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid.

Certified copy as per rules.

(Rajendra Menon) Judge ss/-

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties Khet Singh vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education