Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Nandkumar Barkade Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Nandkumar Barkade vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Mar 13, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1041877

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Nandkumar Barkade

Advocate Shri. Wakil Khan

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

1 m. cr.c.no.1633/11. 12.3.2013 . shri wakil khan, learned counsel for the petitioner. shri pramod chourasiya, learned p.l.for the respondent/ state. heard on the question of admission. the petitioner/ accused has filed this petition section 482 of cr.p.c. for quashment of the firs.information report registered as crime no.61/2010, p.s.ghansour against him for the offence under section 306 of ipc along with an additional prayer to quash the entire investigation as well as charge sheet of the case. during the cours.of arguments on admission in response of the query of the court based on case diary statement of the witnesses of the parental family of the deceased, the petitioner's counsel instead to argue further seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to raise all the grounds stated in the petition at the appropriate stage of the trial in the defence. considering his prayer petition is dismissed as withdrawn and not pressed with liberty aforesaid.c.c. as per rules. (u. c.maheshwari) judge k

Full Judgment

1 M.

Cr.C.No.1633/11.

12.3.2013 .

Shri Wakil Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Shri Pramod Chourasiya, learned P.L.for the respondent/ State.

Heard on the question of admission.

The petitioner/ accused has filed this petition Section 482 of Cr.P.C.

for quashment of the fiRs.information report registered as Crime No.61/2010, P.S.Ghansour against him for the offence under Section 306 of IPC along with an additional prayer to quash the entire investigation as well as charge sheet of the case.

During the couRs.of arguments on admission in response of the query of the Court based on case diary statement of the witnesses of the parental family of the deceased, the petitioner's counsel instead to argue further seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to raise all the grounds stated in the petition at the appropriate stage of the trial in the defence.

Considering his prayer petition is dismissed as withdrawn and not pressed with liberty aforesaid.C.C.

as per rules.

(U.

C.Maheshwari) Judge k

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial