Devendra JaIn Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Devendra Jain vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jan 29, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1041729

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1041729
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Jan 29, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Devendra Jain

Advocate Shri. Vivek Agarwal

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

1 m.cr.c.no.15418/12 29/1/2013 shri vivek agarwal, counsel for the petitioner. smt. nirmala nayak, government advocate for the respondent / state. this petition has been preferred under section 482 of cr.p.c for restoration of m cr. c no.5100/2012, dismissed for want of prosecution on 2.7.2012 by this court. learned counsel for the petitioner filed an affidavit in support of this petition, disclosing the cause of absence, simply inadvertence on his part so that he himself could not see his case in the cause list not only once, but twice. such inadvertence is not expected from a lawyer. in view of the fact that he is keen interested and willing to take the matter wholeheartedly and no party should be put to loss for lapses of the counsel, petition is allowed. m.cr.c no.5100/12 is restored to its original number. so far as this m.cr.c is concerned, it stands disposed of. cc as per rules. (tarun kumar kaushal) judge dcs/- 2

Full Judgment

1 M.Cr.C.No.15418/12 29/1/2013 Shri Vivek Agarwal, counsel for the petitioner.

Smt.

Nirmala Nayak, Government Advocate for the respondent / State.

This petition has been preferred under Section 482 of Cr.P.C for restoration of M Cr.

C No.5100/2012, dismissed for want of prosecution on 2.7.2012 by this Court.

Learned counsel for the petitioner filed an affidavit in support of this petition, disclosing the cause of absence, simply inadvertence on his part so that he himself could not see his case in the Cause List not only once, but twice.

Such inadvertence is not expected from a lawyer.

In view of the fact that he is keen interested and willing to take the matter wholeheartedly and no party should be put to loss for lapses of the counsel, petition is allowed.

M.Cr.C No.5100/12 is restored to its original number.

So far as this M.Cr.C is concerned, it stands disposed of.

CC as per rules.

(Tarun Kumar Kaushal) JUDGE dcs/- 2

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Devendra Jain vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education