Ashoki Bai Vs. Shyamlal

Ashoki Bai vs Shyamlal

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jan 29, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1041706

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1041706
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Jan 29, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ashoki Bai

Advocate Shri. Mukesh Pandey

Respondent

Shyamlal

Excerpt

1 m.cr.c no.383/2013 29/1/2013 shri mukesh pandey, counsel for the petitioner. none for the respondent. this petition has been preferred under section 482 of cr.p.c, for issuance of direction to take effective steps in the case of maintenance in the trial court against the respondent. on perusal of the records, it is revealed that in the year 2003, petitioner filed an application under section 125 of cr.p.c in the court of jmfc, lakhanadon. in pursuance of the order dated 5.8.2006 on it respondent / husband made some irregular installment of some amount. it is further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that matter initiated 7 years ago is still pending and trial court failed to take proper effective steps in the matter for grant of maintenance to the petitioner. in view of the aforesaid, instead of sending notice of the petition to the respondent, it is directed that trial court shall expedite of hearing of m.j.c no.107/2007 ensure regular recovery of 2 m.cr.c no.383/2013 maintenance amount from the respondent and will take effective steps, including issuance of warrant also, if required. petition stands disposed of as above. cc as per rules. (tarun kumar kaushal) judge dcs/-

Full Judgment

1 M.Cr.C No.383/2013 29/1/2013 Shri Mukesh Pandey, counsel for the petitioner.

None for the respondent.

This petition has been preferred under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, for issuance of direction to take effective steps in the case of maintenance in the trial Court against the respondent.

On perusal of the records, it is revealed that in the year 2003, petitioner filed an application under Section 125 of Cr.P.C in the Court of JMFC, Lakhanadon.

In pursuance of the order dated 5.8.2006 on it respondent / husband made some irregular installment of some amount.

It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that matter initiated 7 years ago is still pending and trial Court failed to take proper effective steps in the matter for grant of maintenance to the petitioner.

In view of the aforesaid, instead of sending notice of the petition to the respondent, it is directed that trial Court shall expedite of hearing of M.J.C No.107/2007 ensure regular recovery of 2 M.Cr.C No.383/2013 maintenance amount from the respondent and will take effective steps, including issuance of warrant also, if required.

Petition stands disposed of as above.

CC as per rules.

(Tarun Kumar Kaushal) JUDGE dcs/-

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Ashoki Bai vs Shyamlal Same Subject Education