Surendra Kumar Purwar Vs. Gopal Das Purwar

Surendra Kumar Purwar vs Gopal Das Purwar

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Apr 30, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1041689

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1041689
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Apr 30, 2013
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Surendra Kumar Purwar

Respondent

Gopal Das Purwar

Excerpt

writ petition no ::7382. / 2013 surendra kumar purwar versus gopal das purwar 30.04.2013. shri nitin agrawal for the petitioner. challenging the orders passed by the trial court rejecting an application under order 14 rule 5 of the code of civil procedure, refusing to frame additional issues on the ground that the issues framed are sufficient to decide the dispute between the parties, this petition has been filed under article 227 of the constitution. discretion exercised by the court for rejecting the application cannot be termed as perverse, erroneous or illegal to such an extent that interference in this petition under article 227 is called for. accordingly, finding no ground for interference, the petition is dismissed. (rajendra menon) judge aks/-

Full Judgment

Writ Petition No ::

7382. / 2013 Surendra Kumar Purwar versus Gopal Das Purwar 30.04.2013.

Shri Nitin Agrawal for the petitioner.

Challenging the orders passed by the trial court rejecting an application under Order 14 Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, refusing to frame additional issues on the ground that the issues framed are sufficient to decide the dispute between the parties, this petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution.

Discretion exercised by the Court for rejecting the application cannot be termed as perverse, erroneous or illegal to such an extent that interference in this petition under Article 227 is called for.

Accordingly, finding no ground for interference, the petition is dismissed.

(RAJENDRA MENON) JUDGE Aks/-

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Surendra Kumar Purwar vs Gopal Das Purwar Same Subject Land Acquisition