Shiv Kumar Gupta Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Shiv Kumar Gupta vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Aug 23, 2012

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1041611

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1041611
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Aug 23, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Shiv Kumar Gupta

Advocate Shri. Amrit Lal Gupta

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

writ petition no.12130/12. 23.8.2012 shri amrit lal gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner. shri s.m.lal, learned govt. adv.for the respondents no.1 to 4 and 7, on advance copy. appearing counsel of the petitioner submits that after filing this petition the petitioner has taken away the brief from his office and he is not in a position to make any submission on admission today. such submission is taken on record. petitioner’s counsel is permitted to withdraw from this case. at this juncture, smt. nilima giri, appeared on behalf of the petitioner submits that she has filed his vakalatnama after obtaining the not from the earlier counsel. reader is directed to call the same and place on record. having heard, it is directed that on payment of p.f.along with requisite of the registered post within 3 working days, the notice against admission of this petition as well as of interim relief, returnable by fixing a date in the month of september,2012, be issued to the respondents failing which, this petition shall stand dismissed automatically without further reference to the bench. as an interim measure till next hearing of this petition, the parties are directed to maintain the status-quo with respect of structure and nature of the disputed place as it exists today. certified copy as per rules. (u.c.maheshwari) judge pb

Full Judgment

Writ Petition No.12130/12.

23.8.2012 Shri Amrit Lal Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Shri S.M.Lal, learned Govt.

Adv.for the respondents no.1 to 4 and 7, on advance copy.

Appearing counsel of the petitioner submits that after filing this petition the petitioner has taken away the brief from his Office and he is not in a position to make any submission on admission today.

Such submission is taken on record.

Petitioner’s counsel is permitted to withdraw from this case.

At this juncture, Smt.

Nilima Giri, appeared on behalf of the petitioner submits that she has filed his Vakalatnama after obtaining the not from the earlier counsel.

Reader is directed to call the same and place on record.

Having heard, it is directed that on payment of P.F.along with requisite of the registered post within 3 working days, the notice against admission of this petition as well as of interim relief, returnable by fixing a date in the month of September,2012, be issued to the respondents failing which, this petition shall stand dismissed automatically without further reference to the Bench.

As an interim measure till next hearing of this petition, the parties are directed to maintain the status-quo with respect of structure and nature of the disputed place as it exists today.

Certified copy as per rules.

(U.C.Maheshwari) Judge Pb

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties Shiv Kumar Gupta vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education