Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rambharosh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Rambharosh vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Feb 26, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1041480

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rambharosh

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

26.2.2013 shri mukesh pandey, advocate for the applicants. shri punit shroti, pl for the state. this is the firs.bail application filed by the applicants under section 439 of the cr.p.c.for grant of bail. the applicants are in custody since 18.11.2012 in connection with crime no.621/2012 registered at p.s.chourai, district chhindwara for the offence punishable under sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324 and 307 of the ipc. learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the case. as per prosecution, it is alleged against the applicants that at the time of incident, they used hard and blunt object like lathi, therefore, no offence under section 307 of the ipc is made out against them. charge sheet has been filed. the applicants are in custody and trial would take considerable time to conclude, therefore, they be released on bail. learned counsel for state has opposed the application. on due consideration of the contention raised by the learned counsel for the parties and overall facts and circumstances of the case, i am of the considered view that it is a fit case to release the applicants on bail, therefore, without expressing any view on the merits of the case, this application is allowed and it is directed that applicants shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in a sum of rs.30,000/- (rs.thirty thousand only) each with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the committal court/ trial court for securing their presence before the said court on all the dates of hearing fixed in this regard during trial. certified copy as per rules. (g.s.solanki) judge pb

Full Judgment

26.2.2013 Shri Mukesh Pandey, Advocate for the applicants.

Shri Punit Shroti, PL for the State.

This is the fiRs.bail application filed by the applicants under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C.for grant of bail.

The applicants are in custody since 18.11.2012 in connection with Crime No.621/2012 registered at P.S.Chourai, District Chhindwara for the offence punishable under sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324 and 307 of the IPC.

Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the case.

As per prosecution, it is alleged against the applicants that at the time of incident, they used hard and blunt object like lathi, therefore, no offence under Section 307 of the IPC is made out against them.

Charge sheet has been filed.

The applicants are in custody and trial would take considerable time to conclude, therefore, they be released on bail.

Learned counsel for State has opposed the application.

On due consideration of the contention raised by the learned counsel for the parties and overall facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the considered view that it is a fit case to release the applicants on bail, therefore, without expressing any view on the merits of the case, this application is allowed and it is directed that applicants shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in a sum of Rs.30,000/- (Rs.Thirty Thousand only) each with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the committal Court/ trial Court for securing their presence before the said Court on all the dates of hearing fixed in this regard during trial.

Certified copy as per rules.

(G.S.Solanki) Judge PB

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial