Arvind Kumar Joshi Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Arvind Kumar Joshi vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Feb 18, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1041372

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1041372
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Feb 18, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Arvind Kumar Joshi

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

writ petition no.17811/2012 18.2.2013 mr.manish verma, learned counsel for the petitioner. mr.rajesh tiwari, learned government advocate for the respondent no.1. mr.aditya adhikari, learned counsel for the respondent no.2. mr.greeshm jain, learned counsel for the respondent no.3. rejoinders filed vide i.a.no.1802/2013 and i.a.no.1800/2013 are taken on record. accordingly, i.a.no.1802/2013 and i.a.no.1800/2013 are allowed. learned counsel for the respondent no.3 submits that he shall file reply during cours.of the day. learned counsel for the respondent no.2 submits that he shall file an additional return during cours.of the day. in view of order dated 19.12.2012 passed by the division bench of this court, let the writ petition be listed on 25th february, 2013 for final disposal at the motion stage. (alok aradhe) judge rc.

Full Judgment

Writ Petition No.17811/2012 18.2.2013 Mr.Manish Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Mr.Rajesh Tiwari, learned Government Advocate for the respondent No.1.

Mr.Aditya Adhikari, learned counsel for the respondent No.2.

Mr.Greeshm Jain, learned counsel for the respondent No.3.

Rejoinders filed vide I.A.No.1802/2013 and I.A.No.1800/2013 are taken on record.

Accordingly, I.A.No.1802/2013 and I.A.No.1800/2013 are allowed.

Learned counsel for the respondent No.3 submits that he shall file reply during couRs.of the day.

Learned counsel for the respondent No.2 submits that he shall file an additional return during couRs.of the day.

In view of order dated 19.12.2012 passed by the Division Bench of this Court, let the writ petition be listed on 25th February, 2013 for final disposal at the motion stage.

(Alok Aradhe) Judge RC.

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Arvind Kumar Joshi vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education