Ramsagar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Ramsagar vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Dec 04, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1041313

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1041313
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Dec 04, 2012
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ramsagar

Advocate Shri. S.D.Mishra

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

1 w.p.19525 o”4. 12.2012 shri s.d.mishra, counsel for the petitioner. smt sharda dubey, ga for the respondents/state. heard. the petitioner has filed this petition under article 226 of the constitution of india for issuing the appropriate writ in the nature of mandamus restraining the authorities of the respondents from illegal use of his land. in addition to it, the prayer for issuing appropriate direction to the authorities of respondents no.2 to 4 to decide his pending representation annex.p/5 to p/8 on some early date is also made. having heard the counsel, in the available circumstances, without expressing any opinion on merits of the matter, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the authorities of respondents no.1 to 5 to consider and decide the above mentioned representations annex.p/5 to p/8 of the petitioner with speaking order within sixty days from the date of filing the certified copy of this order along with the copy of the petition and annexures in the offices of respondents no.2 and 3. the petitioner's counsel is directed to submit the aforesaid papers in the office of such authorities within ten days. c.c as per rules. (u.c.maheshwari) judge mkl

Full Judgment

1 W.P.19525 o”

4. 12.2012 Shri S.D.Mishra, counsel for the petitioner.

Smt Sharda Dubey, GA for the respondents/State.

Heard.

The petitioner has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing the appropriate writ in the nature of mandamus restraining the authorities of the respondents from illegal use of his land.

In addition to it, the prayer for issuing appropriate direction to the authorities of respondents No.2 to 4 to decide his pending representation Annex.P/5 to P/8 on some early date is also made.

Having heard the counsel, in the available circumstances, without expressing any opinion on merits of the matter, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the authorities of respondents No.1 to 5 to consider and decide the above mentioned representations Annex.P/5 to P/8 of the petitioner with speaking order within sixty days from the date of filing the certified copy of this order along with the copy of the petition and annexures in the offices of respondents No.2 and 3.

The petitioner's counsel is directed to submit the aforesaid papers in the office of such authorities within ten days.

C.C as per rules.

(U.C.Maheshwari) Judge MKL

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties Ramsagar vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Land Acquisition