Dilip Kumar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Dilip Kumar vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Apr 04, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1041278

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1041278
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Apr 04, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dilip Kumar

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

.....the month of june. missing report was lodged by the applicants, she was traced by the police, her statement was recorded but she did not make any statement in regard to demand of dowry by the applicants, thereafter, she went her parental house and lodged false report against applicants. counsel has further submitted that it is a matrimonial case, in the event of arrest, the chances of compromise between the parties, if any, will be diminished, therefore, the applicants be released on ad-interim anticipatory bail. learned counsel for state has opposed the application. on due consideration of the contention raised by the learned counsel for the parties and overall facts and circumstances of the case, i am of the considered view that it is a fit case to grant ad-interim anticipatory bail to the applicants, therefore, without expressing any view on the merits of the case, i.a.no.7308/2013 is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest, the applicants shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in a sum of rs.25,000/- (rs.twenty five thousand only) each with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer. the applicants are directed to join the investigation and fully co-operate with the investigating agency. they shall further abide by the other conditions enumerated in sub-section (2) of section 438 of cr.p.c.this order shall remain in force till disposal of the main application under section 438 of cr.p.c.list in the week commencing 22.4.2013. certified copy as per rules. (g.s.solanki) judge pb

Full Judgment

M.Cr.C.No.4016/2013 4.4.2013 Shri Ashish Sinha, Advocate for the applicants.

Shri R.K.Kesarwani, PL for the State.

Admit.

Call for the case diary.

Heard on I.A.No.7308/2013, an application for grant of ad-interim anticipatory bail to the applicants.

The applicants apprehend their arrest in connection with Crime No.31/2013 registered at P.S.Kotwali, District Sehore for the offence punishable under Sections 498-A, 34 of the IPC.

Learned counsel for the applicants submits that applicants have been falsely implicated in the case.

Complainant Aarti is wife of applicant No.1 Dilip.

Their marriage was solemnized in January, 2012.

The complainant left her matrimonial house without informing anyone in the month of June.

Missing report was lodged by the applicants, she was traced by the Police, her statement was recorded but she did not make any statement in regard to demand of dowry by the applicants, thereafter, she went her parental house and lodged false report against applicants.

Counsel has further submitted that it is a matrimonial case, in the event of arrest, the chances of compromise between the parties, if any, will be diminished, therefore, the applicants be released on ad-interim anticipatory bail.

Learned counsel for State has opposed the application.

On due consideration of the contention raised by the learned counsel for the parties and overall facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the considered view that it is a fit case to grant ad-interim anticipatory bail to the applicants, therefore, without expressing any view on the merits of the case, I.A.No.7308/2013 is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest, the applicants shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rs.Twenty Five Thousand only) each with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer.

The applicants are directed to join the investigation and fully co-operate with the investigating agency.

They shall further abide by the other conditions enumerated in sub-section (2) of Section 438 of Cr.P.C.This order shall remain in force till disposal of the main application under section 438 of Cr.P.C.List in the week commencing 22.4.2013.

Certified copy as per rules.

(G.S.Solanki) Judge PB

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Dilip Kumar vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education