Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Brahma Narayan Singh Vs. Man Singh

Brahma Narayan Singh vs Man Singh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Apr 04, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1041264

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Brahma Narayan Singh

Advocate Shri. R.Tiwari

Respondent

Man Singh

Advocate Shri. Kaurav

Excerpt

w.p.no.5735/2013 4.4.2013 shri kishore shrivastava, learned senior advocate with shri r.tiwari, counsel for the petitioners.shri p.k.kaurav, additional advocate general, for the respondents no.14, 15 and 16. it is submitted by shri kaurav that as name of the advocate general is not appearing in cause list, so the brief of the case is not available with him. he prays for time to seek instructions in the matter from respondents no.14,15 and 16. prayer allowed. petitioner is directed to serve one more copy of the petition to shri kaurav, during cours.of the day, against acknowledgment. during cours.of the hearing, it is stated by shri shrivastava that an ex-parte injunction order was passed by respondent no.16 on 23.2.2013. the petitioners were not served before passing ex-parte temporary injunction order. when the petitioners went to the office of respondent no.16 to inspect the file, it was intimated to them that the file is under the lock and key of respondent no.16 and they were not permitted to inspect the file. it is stated by the learned counsel that because of it, the reply could not be filed. after considering the aforesaid contention of shri shrivastava, we direct shri kaurav to seek instructions from respondent no.16 in this regard and also to apprise this court about the factual position in the case. be listed for hearing on 8.4.2013, to consider the prayer of petitioners for admission and also for issuance of ad-interim. a typed copy of this order be supply to shri kaurav, learned counsel for the respondents no.14,15 and 16 for necessary action and compliance. (krishn kumar lahoti) (b.d.rathi) judge judge ir.

Full Judgment

W.P.No.5735/2013 4.4.2013 Shri Kishore Shrivastava, learned Senior Advocate with Shri R.Tiwari, counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri P.K.Kaurav, Additional Advocate General, for the respondents No.14, 15 and 16.

It is submitted by Shri Kaurav that as name of the Advocate General is not appearing in cause list, so the brief of the case is not available with him.

He prays for time to seek instructions in the matter from respondents No.14,15 and 16.

Prayer allowed.

Petitioner is directed to serve one more copy of the petition to Shri Kaurav, during couRs.of the day, against acknowledgment.

During couRs.of the hearing, it is stated by Shri Shrivastava that an ex-parte injunction order was passed by respondent No.16 on 23.2.2013.

The petitioners were not served before passing ex-parte temporary injunction order.

When the petitioners went to the office of respondent No.16 to inspect the file, it was intimated to them that the file is under the lock and key of respondent No.16 and they were not permitted to inspect the file.

It is stated by the learned counsel that because of it, the reply could not be filed.

After considering the aforesaid contention of Shri Shrivastava, we direct Shri Kaurav to seek instructions from respondent No.16 in this regard and also to apprise this court about the factual position in the case.

Be listed for hearing on 8.4.2013, to consider the prayer of petitioners for admission and also for issuance of ad-interim.

A typed copy of this order be supply to Shri Kaurav, learned counsel for the respondents No.14,15 and 16 for necessary action and compliance.

(Krishn Kumar Lahoti) (B.D.Rathi) Judge Judge ir.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial