Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Jangliya Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Jangliya vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Aug 06, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1041029

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jangliya

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

1 criminal revision no.1312/12 06.08.2012. shri ashish tiwari, advocate for the applicant. shri v.lakhera, pl for state. heard on the point of admission. perused the records of courts below. revision seems to be arguable, hence admitted for final hearing. also heard on ia 14690/12, an application for suspension of sentence and grant of bail to the applicant. learned counsel for applicant submits that applicant has been convicted under section 379 of ipc and sentenced to suffer r.i.for two years by cjm, katni in criminal case no.3847/08. against the aforesaid judgment, criminal appeal no.170/10 was preferred which stood dismissed on 24.12.11 by learned sessions judge, katni and judgment delivered by cjm, katni was maintained. it is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that applicant is in jail since 24.12.11 and if the jail sentence is not suspended the revision will become futile. considering the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that jail sentence imposed on applicant jangliya 2 shall remain suspended until further orders and he shall be released on bail on his furnishing solvent surety for a sum of rs.25,000/-( rs.twenty five thousand only) and a personal bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of cjm, katni, for his appearance before the registry of this court on 18.12.12, and on such further dates as may be fixed from time to time. list for final hearing in due course. c.c.as per rules. (m.a.siddiqui) judge. jk.

Full Judgment

1 Criminal Revision No.1312/12 06.08.2012.

Shri Ashish Tiwari, Advocate for the applicant.

Shri V.Lakhera, PL for State.

Heard on the point of admission.

Perused the records of Courts below.

Revision seems to be arguable, hence admitted for final hearing.

Also heard on IA 14690/12, an application for suspension of sentence and grant of bail to the applicant.

Learned counsel for applicant submits that applicant has been convicted under Section 379 of IPC and sentenced to suffer R.I.for two years by CJM, Katni in Criminal Case No.3847/08.

Against the aforesaid judgment, Criminal Appeal No.170/10 was preferred which stood dismissed on 24.12.11 by learned Sessions Judge, Katni and judgment delivered by CJM, Katni was maintained.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that applicant is in jail since 24.12.11 and if the jail sentence is not suspended the revision will become futile.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that jail sentence imposed on applicant Jangliya 2 shall remain suspended until further orders and he shall be released on bail on his furnishing solvent surety for a sum of Rs.25,000/-( Rs.Twenty Five Thousand Only) and a personal bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of CJM, Katni, for his appearance before the Registry of this Court on 18.12.12, and on such further dates as may be fixed from time to time.

List for final hearing in due course.

C.c.as per rules.

(M.A.Siddiqui) Judge.

Jk.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial