Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Premlal Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Premlal vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Aug 06, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1041003

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Premlal

Advocate Shri. Amit Upadhyay

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

m.cr.c.no.6303/2012 06.08.2012 shri amit upadhyay, counsel for the applicant. shri akhilendra kumar singh, ga for the respondent/state. heard. the applicant has been arrested in connection with crime no.87/2012 registered at p.s.sahpur, dindori for the offence punishable under sections 376, 511 of ipc. learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is in custody since 15.4.2012. he has been falsely implicated in this case. as per mlc report no injury was found on the person of the prosecutrix. charge has already been filed and trial would take considerable time to conclude finally, therefore, he prays for grant of bail to applicant. learned counsel for the state opposes the prayer. on due consideration of the contentions raised by the counsel for the parties along with facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, i am of the view that it is a fit case for grant of bail to the applicant. his application is allowed. it is directed that applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of rs.25,000/- (rupees twenty five thousand) with a solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the committal court/trial court concerned, for his appearance before the said court and on all such other dates as given in this regard by the said court during trial. c.c.as per rules. (g.s.solanki) ravi judge

Full Judgment

M.Cr.C.No.6303/2012 06.08.2012 Shri Amit Upadhyay, counsel for the applicant.

Shri Akhilendra Kumar Singh, GA for the respondent/State.

Heard.

The applicant has been arrested in connection with Crime No.87/2012 registered at P.S.Sahpur, Dindori for the offence punishable under Sections 376, 511 of IPC.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is in custody since 15.4.2012.

He has been falsely implicated in this case.

As per MLC report no injury was found on the person of the prosecutrix.

Charge has already been filed and trial would take considerable time to conclude finally, therefore, he prays for grant of bail to applicant.

Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer.

On due consideration of the contentions raised by the counsel for the parties along with facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the view that it is a fit case for grant of bail to the applicant.

His application is allowed.

It is directed that applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with a solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Committal Court/Trial Court concerned, for his appearance before the said Court and on all such other dates as given in this regard by the said Court during trial.

C.C.as per rules.

(G.S.Solanki) ravi JUDGE

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial