Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Kamal Narayan Vs. Kripa Shankar

Kamal Narayan vs Kripa Shankar

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Aug 06, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1040971

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Kamal Narayan

Advocate Shri. Ramesh Tamrakar

Respondent

Kripa Shankar

Excerpt

m.cr.c.no.8805/12 06.08.2012. shri ramesh tamrakar, learned counsel for petitioners.shri a.namdeo, learned pl for respondent no.2/state. heard on the point of admission. issue notice to respondent no.1 to show cause against admission by both modes, i.e., ordinary as well as by rad post. pf be paid within three clear working days by rad post as well as by ordinary mode. notice is made returnable within four weeks. also heard on ia no.15195/2012, an application for stay. learned counsel for petitioner submits that the alleged allegation about defamation took place at chowrai, district-chhindwara for which offence could be tried in district-chhindwara and not at bhopal, and bhopal court has wrongly taken the cognizance and rt no.6853/09 has been registered which is pending in the 2 court of jmfc, bhopal (presided over by smt. shashi singh).counsel submits that if the stay is not granted, then this petition will become futile. looking to the circumstances of the case, it is directed that till next date of hearing, further proceedings pending in the court of jmfc, bhopal (presided over by smt. shashi singh) in rt no.6853/09 shall remain stayed. list immediately after four weeks. c.c.as per rules. (m.a.siddiqui) judge. jk. 2

Full Judgment

M.Cr.C.No.8805/12 06.08.2012.

Shri Ramesh Tamrakar, learned counsel for petitioneRs.Shri A.Namdeo, learned PL for respondent no.2/State.

Heard on the point of admission.

Issue notice to respondent no.1 to show cause against admission by both modes, i.e., ordinary as well as by RAD post.

PF be paid within three clear working days by RAD post as well as by Ordinary Mode.

Notice is made returnable within four weeks.

Also heard on IA No.15195/2012, an application for stay.

Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the alleged allegation about defamation took place at Chowrai, District-Chhindwara for which offence could be tried in District-Chhindwara and not at Bhopal, and Bhopal Court has wrongly taken the cognizance and RT No.6853/09 has been registered which is pending in the 2 Court of JMFC, Bhopal (Presided Over by Smt.

Shashi Singh).Counsel submits that if the stay is not granted, then this petition will become futile.

Looking to the circumstances of the case, it is directed that till next date of hearing, further proceedings pending in the Court of JMFC, Bhopal (Presided Over by Smt.

Shashi Singh) in RT No.6853/09 shall remain stayed.

List immediately after four weeks.

C.c.as per rules.

(M.A.Siddiqui) Judge.

Jk.

2

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial