Arjun Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Arjun Singh vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Dec 17, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1040947

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1040947
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Dec 17, 2012
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Arjun Singh

Advocate Shri. Ajeet Singh

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

w.p.no.21112/2012 17.12.2012 shri ajeet singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. shri b.p.pandey, learned dy.govt.adv.for the state. petitioner claims to be a daily wages employee working on the post of road roller helper in the department since 1989. it is a case of the petitioner that as he has been working for more than 10 years he is entitled to be regularized in accordance to the policies and circulars of the state government. considering the aforesaid contentions advanced by learned counsel and the law laid down by the supreme court in the case of secretary, state of karnataka & ors.versus uma devi & ors.- (2006).scc 1 and the circulars issued in pursuance to the same, respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner in accordance to the policies formulated as indicated herein above and decide it within the period of three months. in case claim of the petitioner has already been taken into consideration by the scrutiny committee, action on the report be undertaken and decision taken and communicated to the petitioner within the aforesaid period. with the aforesaid, this petition stands disposed of. (rajendra menon) judge mrs.mishra

Full Judgment

W.P.No.21112/2012 17.12.2012 Shri Ajeet Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Shri B.P.Pandey, learned Dy.Govt.Adv.for the State.

Petitioner claims to be a daily wages employee working on the post of Road Roller Helper in the department since 1989.

It is a case of the petitioner that as he has been working for more than 10 years he is entitled to be regularized in accordance to the policies and Circulars of the State Government.

Considering the aforesaid contentions advanced by learned counsel and the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka & ORS.versus Uma Devi & ORS.- (2006).SCC 1 and the circulars issued in pursuance to the same, respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner in accordance to the policies formulated as indicated herein above and decide it within the period of three months.

In case claim of the petitioner has already been taken into consideration by the Scrutiny Committee, action on the report be undertaken and decision taken and communicated to the petitioner within the aforesaid period.

With the aforesaid, this petition stands disposed of.

(RAJENDRA MENON) JUDGE MRS.mishra

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties Arjun Singh vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Land Acquisition