Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Jaybeer Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Jaybeer Singh vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jul 23, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1040914

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jaybeer Singh

Advocate Shri. Vipin Yadav

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

w.p.no.10242/12 (jaybeer singh versus state of mp and others.23.07.2012 heard shri vipin yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and shri s.s.bisen, learned g.a.for state on advance copy on the question of admission and interim relief. the petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by the fact that the commissioner, rewa division rewa is not taking any action on the complaint filed by the petitioner under section 36 of the m.p.gram panchayat avam gram swaraj adhiniyam,1993 wherein he has brought to the notice of the authority the fact that the respondent no.3 has been convicted by the competent court and therefore, become disqualified to hold the post of member of zila panchayat, rewa. it is also submitted that though the complaint has been filed by the petitioner before the commissioner on 22.11.2011 but no steps have been taken thereon by the said authority till date. the learned government advocate appearing for the state on advance copy submits that the commissioner shall look into the matter and decide the same expeditiously, in accordance with law. in view of the aforesaid, without entering into the merits of the case, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.2, the commissioner, rewa division rewa to take up the complaint filed by the petitioner on 22.12.2011 and decide the same expeditiously, in accordance with law after giving due opportunity of hearing to all concerned, as far as possible within two months from the date of furnishing a copy of the order passed today and a copy of the petition on the said authority by the petitioner. with the aforesaid directions, the petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of. c.c.as per rules. (r.s.jha) judge msp

Full Judgment

W.P.No.10242/12 (Jaybeer Singh versus State of MP and otheRs.23.07.2012 Heard Shri Vipin Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri S.S.Bisen, learned G.A.for State on advance copy on the question of admission and interim relief.

The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by the fact that the Commissioner, Rewa Division Rewa is not taking any action on the complaint filed by the petitioner under section 36 of the M.P.Gram Panchayat Avam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam,1993 wherein he has brought to the notice of the authority the fact that the respondent No.3 has been convicted by the competent court and therefore, become disqualified to hold the post of Member of Zila Panchayat, Rewa.

It is also submitted that though the complaint has been filed by the petitioner before the Commissioner on 22.11.2011 but no steps have been taken thereon by the said authority till date.

The learned Government Advocate appearing for the State on advance copy submits that the Commissioner shall look into the matter and decide the same expeditiously, in accordance with law.

In view of the aforesaid, without entering into the merits of the case, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2, the Commissioner, Rewa Division Rewa to take up the complaint filed by the petitioner on 22.12.2011 and decide the same expeditiously, in accordance with law after giving due opportunity of hearing to all concerned, as far as possible within two months from the date of furnishing a copy of the order passed today and a copy of the petition on the said authority by the petitioner.

With the aforesaid directions, the petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of.

C.C.as per rules.

(R.S.Jha) Judge msp

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial