Laxman Singh Vs. the Collector

Laxman Singh vs The Collector

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jan 28, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1040801

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1040801
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Jan 28, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Laxman Singh

Advocate Shri. Arvind Soni

Respondent

The Collector

Excerpt

laxman singh versus the collector & ors.writ petiton no.863 ”28. 1.2013: shri arvind soni, learned counsel for the petitioner. interalia contending that respondent nos.4 to 7 have illegally entered into the land of petitioner and are trying to kill the petitioner, committed assault on him, this writ petition is filed complaining that f.i.r.of the petitioner is not registered by the police and no investigation into the matter is taken. records indicate that civil suit between the parties is already pending before the competent court at jabalpur and the material available on record does not show that it is an appropriate case where extraordinary power available to this court in a petition under article 226 of the constitution is exercised. if f.i.r.is not registered and police is not taking action, petitioner can file a private criminal complaint and seek interference into the matter. accordingly, finding no case for interference on the grounds raised, the petition is dismissed. (rajendra menon) judge ss/-

Full Judgment

Laxman Singh versus The Collector & ORS.Writ Petiton No.863 ”

28. 1.2013: Shri Arvind Soni, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Interalia contending that respondent Nos.4 to 7 have illegally entered into the land of petitioner and are trying to kill the petitioner, committed assault on him, this writ petition is filed complaining that F.I.R.of the petitioner is not registered by the police and no investigation into the matter is taken.

Records indicate that civil suit between the parties is already pending before the competent court at Jabalpur and the material available on record does not show that it is an appropriate case where extraordinary power available to this Court in a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution is exercised.

If F.I.R.is not registered and police is not taking action, petitioner can file a private criminal complaint and seek interference into the matter.

Accordingly, finding no case for interference on the grounds raised, the petition is dismissed.

(Rajendra Menon) Judge ss/-

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Laxman Singh vs The Collector Same Subject Education