Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Prathavilal Vs. Union of India

Prathavilal vs Union of India

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Oct 29, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1040621

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Prathavilal

Advocate Shri. Devesh Khatri

Respondent

Union of India

Advocate Shri. Rajas Pohankar, Shri. J.K.Pillai

Excerpt

w.p.no.9333/2008 29.10.2012 shri devesh khatri, learned counsel for the petitioner. shri rajas pohankar, learned counsel for respondents no.2 & 4. shri j.k.pillai, learned counsel for respondent no.3. in terms of the division bench direction of this court, it is necessary on the part of respondents to produce the relevant documents in original such as form-b, the employees pension scheme declaration form, identity card and form-v and relevant papers where the date of birth of the petitioner is declared. learned counsel for respondents no.2 and 4 informes that some of the records have been received by him, but form-b has not been made available to him for which some more time is needed. learned counsel appearing for respondent no.3 informed that he has received the list of provident fund account number from the employer recently and he would take about 15 days' time to collect the relevant documents to produce before this court for verification. considering the aforesaid, time as prayed for is allowed. let the petition be listed in the week commencing 10.12.2012 for consideration. by the aforesaid time, relevant documents be produced. (k.k.trivedi) judge. a.praj.

Full Judgment

W.P.No.9333/2008 29.10.2012 Shri Devesh Khatri, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Shri Rajas Pohankar, learned counsel for respondents No.2 & 4.

Shri J.K.Pillai, learned counsel for respondent No.3.

In terms of the Division bench direction of this Court, it is necessary on the part of respondents to produce the relevant documents in original such as Form-B, the employees pension Scheme declaration Form, identity card and Form-V and relevant papers where the date of birth of the petitioner is declared.

Learned counsel for respondents No.2 and 4 informes that some of the records have been received by him, but Form-B has not been made available to him for which some more time is needed.

Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.3 informed that he has received the list of Provident Fund Account number from the employer recently and he would take about 15 days' time to collect the relevant documents to produce before this Court for verification.

Considering the aforesaid, time as prayed for is allowed.

Let the petition be listed in the week commencing 10.12.2012 for consideration.

By the aforesaid time, relevant documents be produced.

(K.K.Trivedi) Judge.

A.Praj.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial