Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Niranjan Prasad Soni Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Niranjan Prasad Soni vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Mar 19, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1040412

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Niranjan Prasad Soni

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

m.cr.c.no.88/2013 m.cr.c.no.90/2013 19.3.2013 shri pushpendra verma, advocate for the applicants. shri chandrakant mishra, pl for the state. these are the firs.bail applications filed by the applicant under section 439 of the cr.p.c.for grant of bail. the applicants are in custody since 16.10.2012 in connection with crime no.374/2012 registered at p.s.mada, district singroli for the offence punishable under sections 294, 323, 506, 302/34 of the ipc. learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that the applicants have been falsely implicated in this case. according to the prosecution story, it is alleged that co-accused aaditya assaulted deceased lalchand by using sharp edged weapon and the applicants assaulted the deceased by using lathis. as per mlc, the deceased sustained lacerated wounds on his leg. the applicants are in custody and trial would take considerable time to conclude, therefore, they be released on bail. learned counsel for state has opposed the applications. i have perused the case diary. there is named fir lodged by the deceased himself, who died during the treatment. as per mlc report, deceased sustained lacerated wound on left side of his head and another lacerated wound on his forehead. as per the fir lodged by the deceased, it is alleged that the applicants were having lathis and lacerated wounds could be caused by hard and blunt object. considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, i do not find the cases of the applicants fit for grant of bail. the applications are hereby dismissed. certified copy as per rules. (g.s.solanki) judge pb

Full Judgment

M.Cr.C.No.88/2013 M.Cr.C.No.90/2013 19.3.2013 Shri Pushpendra Verma, Advocate for the applicants.

Shri Chandrakant Mishra, PL for the State.

These are the fiRs.bail applications filed by the applicant under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C.for grant of bail.

The applicants are in custody since 16.10.2012 in connection with Crime No.374/2012 registered at P.S.Mada, District Singroli for the offence punishable under sections 294, 323, 506, 302/34 of the IPC.

Learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that the applicants have been falsely implicated in this case.

According to the prosecution story, it is alleged that co-accused Aaditya assaulted deceased Lalchand by using sharp edged weapon and the applicants assaulted the deceased by using lathis.

As per MLC, the deceased sustained lacerated wounds on his leg.

The applicants are in custody and trial would take considerable time to conclude, therefore, they be released on bail.

Learned counsel for State has opposed the applications.

I have perused the case diary.

There is named FIR lodged by the deceased himself, who died during the treatment.

As per MLC report, deceased sustained lacerated wound on left side of his head and another lacerated wound on his forehead.

As per the FIR lodged by the deceased, it is alleged that the applicants were having lathis and lacerated wounds could be caused by hard and blunt object.

Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, I do not find the cases of the applicants fit for grant of bail.

The applications are hereby dismissed.

Certified copy as per rules.

(G.S.Solanki) Judge PB

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial