Mulchand Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Mulchand vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Dec 18, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1040371

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1040371
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Dec 18, 2012
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mulchand

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

writ petition no.21262/2012 mulchand versus state of mp and others 18.12.2012. shri rajendra pandey for the petitioner. shri rajesh tiwari, government advocate, for the state on advance notice. petitioner claims regularization in service on the ground that he is working as a gangman for more than 25 years and his case for regularization has not been considered in accordance to the circular - annexure p/1. keeping in view the aforesaid, respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization in accordance to the rules framed namely, the gangman service rules, 1996 (annexure p/1) and decide the claim for regularization in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. with the aforesaid, this petition stands allowed and disposed of. certified copy as per rules. (rajendra menon) judge aks/-

Full Judgment

Writ Petition No.21262/2012 Mulchand versus State of MP and others 18.12.2012.

Shri Rajendra Pandey for the petitioner.

Shri Rajesh Tiwari, Government Advocate, for the State on advance notice.

Petitioner claims regularization in service on the ground that he is working as a Gangman for more than 25 years and his case for regularization has not been considered in accordance to the Circular - Annexure P/1.

Keeping in view the aforesaid, respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization in accordance to the Rules framed namely, the Gangman Service Rules, 1996 (Annexure P/1) and decide the claim for regularization in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

With the aforesaid, this petition stands allowed and disposed of.

Certified copy as per rules.

(RAJENDRA MENON) JUDGE Aks/-

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties Mulchand vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Land Acquisition