Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Harnarayan Vs. the State of M.P.

Harnarayan vs The State of M.P.

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jan 04, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1040302

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Harnarayan

Respondent

The State of M.P.

Excerpt

cr.a.no.1728 o”04. 01.2013 none for the appellant. shri amit kumar sharma, learned pl for the respondent- state. in the absence of appellant's counsel and his counsel the adjudication of this appeal on merits is not possible, hence the case is adjourned with a direction to list the same by fixing a date in the month of march 2013. the presence of the appellant before this court for such date be secured by issuing a bailable warrant of rs.5,000/- (rs.five thousand).such warrant be issued positively within five days from today and the same be sent through superintendent of police, sagar with a direction to execute the same under his guidance and supervision, so that the same be not returned back unserved. the case be listed accordingly. (u.c.maheshwari) judge bks

Full Judgment

Cr.A.No.1728 o”

04. 01.2013 None for the appellant.

Shri Amit Kumar Sharma, learned PL for the respondent- State.

In the absence of appellant's counsel and his counsel the adjudication of this appeal on merits is not possible, hence the case is adjourned with a direction to list the same by fixing a date in the month of March 2013.

The presence of the appellant before this court for such date be secured by issuing a bailable warrant of Rs.5,000/- (Rs.Five thousand).Such warrant be issued positively within five days from today and the same be sent through Superintendent of Police, Sagar with a direction to execute the same under his guidance and supervision, so that the same be not returned back unserved.

The case be listed accordingly.

(U.C.Maheshwari) Judge bks

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial