Pawan Kumar Pathak Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Pawan Kumar Pathak vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jan 24, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1040200

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1040200
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Jan 24, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pawan Kumar Pathak

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

writ petition no.622/2013 24.01.2013 mr.pranay choubey, learned counsel for the petitioner. mr.piyush dharamadhikari, learned government advocate for the respondents. learned government advocate for the respondents once again prays for adjournment in order to seek instructions in the matter and to file reply. heard on the question of interim relief. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a limited departmental examination for recruitment for the post of tracer is scheduled to be held on 27.1.2013. however, the petitioner is not being allowed to appear in the aforesaid examination on the ground that he has crossed 50 years of age. it is further submitted that fixation of the age limit is per se arbitrary and in case the petitioner is not permitted to appear in the departmental examination, he will suffer irretrievable prejudice. taking into account the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner and in the facts of the case, it is directed that the respondents shall permit the petitioner to appear in the departmental examination, which is scheduled to be held on 27.1.2013. it is made clear that participation of the petitioner in the aforesaid examination is provisional and his result shall not be declared without leave of this court. certified copy today. (alok aradhe) judge rc

Full Judgment

Writ Petition No.622/2013 24.01.2013 Mr.Pranay Choubey, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Mr.Piyush Dharamadhikari, learned Government Advocate for the respondents.

Learned Government Advocate for the respondents once again prays for adjournment in order to seek instructions in the matter and to file reply.

Heard on the question of interim relief.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a limited departmental examination for recruitment for the post of Tracer is scheduled to be held on 27.1.2013.

However, the petitioner is not being allowed to appear in the aforesaid examination on the ground that he has crossed 50 years of age.

It is further submitted that fixation of the age limit is per se arbitrary and in case the petitioner is not permitted to appear in the departmental examination, he will suffer irretrievable prejudice.

Taking into account the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner and in the facts of the case, it is directed that the respondents shall permit the petitioner to appear in the departmental examination, which is scheduled to be held on 27.1.2013.

It is made clear that participation of the petitioner in the aforesaid examination is provisional and his result shall not be declared without leave of this Court.

Certified copy today.

(Alok Aradhe) Judge RC

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Pawan Kumar Pathak vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education