Union of India Vs. Hari Prasad

Union of India vs Hari Prasad

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Apr 24, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1040095

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1040095
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Apr 24, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Union of India

Advocate Shri. Govind Patel

Respondent

Hari Prasad

Excerpt

union of india & ors.versus hari prasad & another review petition no.219 ”24. 4.2013: shri govind patel, learned counsel for the petitioner. this application has been filed for correcting the name of respondents' counsel, as indicated in the order dated 25.2.2013 passed in w.p.no.16846/2012. it is stated that shri govind patel appeared for the respondents on advance notice and inadvertently the name of shri rohit patel has been typed. keeping in view the aforesaid, name of counsel who appeared on 25.2.2013 in w.p.no.16846/2012 for respondents be read as 'shri govind patel' instead of 'shri rohit patel'. with the aforesaid correction in the order passed by this court in w.p.no.16846/2012, the application is disposed of. (rajendra menon) judge ss/-

Full Judgment

Union of India & ORS.versus Hari Prasad & Another Review Petition No.219 ”

24. 4.2013: Shri Govind Patel, learned counsel for the petitioner.

This application has been filed for correcting the name of respondents' counsel, as indicated in the order dated 25.2.2013 passed in W.P.No.16846/2012.

It is stated that Shri Govind Patel appeared for the respondents on advance notice and inadvertently the name of Shri Rohit Patel has been typed.

Keeping in view the aforesaid, name of counsel who appeared on 25.2.2013 in W.P.No.16846/2012 for respondents be read as 'Shri Govind Patel' instead of 'Shri Rohit Patel'.

With the aforesaid correction in the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.16846/2012, the application is disposed of.

(Rajendra Menon) Judge ss/-

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Union of India vs Hari Prasad Same Subject Education