Revendra Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Revendra Singh vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Apr 24, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1040091

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1040091
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Apr 24, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Revendra Singh

Advocate Shri. Ravendra Singh

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

1 w.p.no.6486/2013 24/4/2013: shri ravendra singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. shri samdarshi tiwari, dy. govt. adv.for the respondents. shri samdarshi tiwari on instructions points out that the question of finalization of tender in question is pending before the state government and a decision has not been taken, till then the toll bridge in question is being departmentally run under the supervision of executive engineer respondent no.2. he prays for two weeks time to seek instructions and file counter affidavit. prayer allowed. till the next date of hearing no contract or third party interest in the matter of grant of toll bridge shall be created. it would be for the department concerned to run the toll bridge. c.c.as per rules. ( rajendra meno.) judge mrs.mishra

Full Judgment

1 W.P.No.6486/2013 24/4/2013: Shri Ravendra Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Shri Samdarshi Tiwari, Dy.

Govt.

Adv.for the respondents.

Shri Samdarshi Tiwari on instructions points out that the question of finalization of tender in question is pending before the State Government and a decision has not been taken, till then the toll bridge in question is being departmentally run under the supervision of Executive Engineer respondent No.2.

He prays for two weeks time to seek instructions and file counter affidavit.

Prayer allowed.

Till the next date of hearing no contract or third party interest in the matter of grant of toll bridge shall be created.

It would be for the department concerned to run the toll bridge.

c.c.as per rules.

( Rajendra MeNo.) Judge Mrs.mishra

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Revendra Singh vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education