Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Juned Hasan Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Juned Hasan vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jan 16, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1040062

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Juned Hasan

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

.....the case. he is not a main accused. it is further submitted that similarly placed co-accused gufran, sadab, salman, shahrukh, naushad, faizal, naved, farhan, afzal, nawab and raees have already been enlarged on bail by this court and case of this applicant is just similar to them. as per prosecution itself it is alleged against this applicant that he was the member of unlawful assembly however, nothing is alleged against him in regard to make assault on deceased rupesh. as per prosecution, rupesh was assaulted by co-accused afzal, farhan, nawab and raees. charge sheet has already been filed and trial would take considerable time to be disposed of finally therefore, he prays for bail to the applicant. learned counsel for the state opposes the application. considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case alongwith the nature of allegation made against this applicant, i am of the considered view that it is a fit case to release him on bail. therefore, without commenting on the merit of the case, this application is allowed and it is directed that applicant juned hasan shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in a sum of rs.50,000/- (rs.fifty thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of committal court/trial court, for securing his presence before the said court on all the dates of hearing fixed in this regard during trial. certified copy as per rules. (g.s.solanki) judge navin

Full Judgment

M.Cr.C.No.14554/2012 16/01/2013 Shri A.

Usmani, Advocate for the applicant.

Shri Pushpraj Singh, PL for the respondent/State.

Heard finally.

This is the fiRs.application filed by applicant under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C for grant of bail.

The applicant has been arrested on 20/11/12 in connection with Crime No.224/10 registered at P.S.Obedulllaganj, District Raisen for the offence punishable under sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 294, 506, 307, 302 of IPC read with sections 25/27 of the Arms Act.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the case.

He is not a main accused.

It is further submitted that similarly placed co-accused Gufran, Sadab, Salman, Shahrukh, Naushad, Faizal, Naved, Farhan, Afzal, Nawab and Raees have already been enlarged on bail by this Court and case of this applicant is just similar to them.

As per prosecution itself it is alleged against this applicant that he was the member of unlawful assembly however, nothing is alleged against him in regard to make assault on deceased Rupesh.

As per prosecution, Rupesh was assaulted by co-accused Afzal, Farhan, Nawab and Raees.

Charge sheet has already been filed and trial would take considerable time to be disposed of finally therefore, he prays for bail to the applicant.

Learned counsel for the State opposes the application.

Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case alongwith the nature of allegation made against this applicant, I am of the considered view that it is a fit case to release him on bail.

Therefore, without commenting on the merit of the case, this application is allowed and it is directed that applicant Juned Hasan shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rs.Fifty Thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of Committal Court/trial Court, for securing his presence before the said Court on all the dates of hearing fixed in this regard during trial.

Certified copy as per rules.

(G.S.SOLANKI) Judge navin

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial