Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ramkisore Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Ramkisore vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Feb 08, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1039930

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ramkisore

Advocate Shri. Amit Garg

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

1 w.p.no.1916/2013 8.2.2013 shri amit garg, learned counsel for the petitioners.grievance of the petitioners are that they are owner of land in question situated in village bariyarpur, kurmiyan majra ranipur, tahsil ajaygarh, district panna. they have filed the revenue record and other documents vide annexure p/1 to say that they are the owner of the land and their grievance is that without conducting any legal procedure for acquiring the land and giving them compensation, without hearing them respondents are entering into the land of the petitioners and carrying out certain digging activities without their permission. challenging the inaction on the part of water resources department, petitioners have filed this writ petition. keeping in view the nature of grievance made by the petitioners.respondent no.3 the commissioner and respondent no.4 the collector are directed to look into the matter and if it is found that petitioners are the owners of the land in question and without following the due process of law and without paying compensation action is taken for dispossessing them or damaging the land, necessary direction be issued to the department concerned which is taking action. on the petitioners.filing certified copy of this order, respondents no.3 an”4. shall pass the order within a period of one month with regard to the grievance of the petitioners in the matter. till then respondents no.2, 5 and 6 are restrained from interfering with the ownership and possession of the land in question. with the aforesaid, this petition stands disposed of. c.c.as per rules. (rajendra menon) judge mrs.mishra

Full Judgment

1 W.P.No.1916/2013 8.2.2013 Shri Amit Garg, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Grievance of the petitioners are that they are owner of land in question situated in Village Bariyarpur, Kurmiyan Majra Ranipur, Tahsil Ajaygarh, District Panna.

They have filed the revenue record and other documents vide Annexure P/1 to say that they are the owner of the land and their grievance is that without conducting any legal procedure for acquiring the land and giving them compensation, without hearing them respondents are entering into the land of the petitioners and carrying out certain digging activities without their permission.

Challenging the inaction on the part of Water Resources Department, petitioners have filed this writ petition.

Keeping in view the nature of grievance made by the petitioneRs.respondent No.3 The Commissioner and respondent No.4 the Collector are directed to look into the matter and if it is found that petitioners are the owners of the land in question and without following the due process of law and without paying compensation action is taken for dispossessing them or damaging the land, necessary direction be issued to the department concerned which is taking action.

On the petitioneRs.filing certified copy of this order, respondents No.3 an”

4. shall pass the order within a period of one month with regard to the grievance of the petitioners in the matter.

Till then respondents No.2, 5 and 6 are restrained from interfering with the ownership and possession of the land in question.

With the aforesaid, this petition stands disposed of.

c.c.as per rules.

(RAJENDRA MENON) JUDGE Mrs.mishra

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial