Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Amit Gupta Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Amit Gupta vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Apr 01, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1039835

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Amit Gupta

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

1 mcrc. no.1626 /2013 1.4.2013 shri sanjeev kumar singh, adv.for the petitioner/applicant. smt. nirmala nayak, ga for state. heard. learned counsel for the applicant submits that co-accused sani @ akash pratap singh has been granted bail u/s 439 cr.p.c in misc.cr.case no.729/2013 on20/02/2013 for the offence u/s 395, 397 of ipc and 11 and 13 of a.d.act that looted gun itself was seized from the possession of complaiant surendra verma hence the applicant may be entitled to grant anticipatory bail . learned counsel for the state objected and submits that though the case is similar but as per incident of the case is u/s 11 and 13 of the mp dacoiti act (ad act) in which there is specific bar for anticipatory bail. at this stage, learned counsel for the applicant wants to withdraw this application with direction that on applicant being surrendered before the court or on he being arrested and brought before the trial court then the applicant amit gupta may be released on bail and his bail application may be considered in the light of order passed in misc.cr. case no.729/13 on 20.2.2013. looking to the facts and circumstances of the case this application is dismissed as withdrawn with this observation that the trial court may consider bail application u/s 439 cr.p.c of the applicant if applicant surrendered or brought before the trial court in the light of order passed in misc.cr. case no.729/13 on 20.2.2013 in accordance with law. c c as per rules. (m.a.siddiqui ) judge ag/ 1

Full Judgment

1 MCRC.

No.1626 /2013 1.4.2013 Shri Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Adv.for the petitioner/applicant.

Smt.

Nirmala Nayak, GA for state.

Heard.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that co-accused Sani @ Akash Pratap Singh has been granted bail u/s 439 Cr.P.C in Misc.Cr.Case No.729/2013 on20/02/2013 for the offence u/s 395, 397 of IPC and 11 and 13 of A.D.Act that looted gun itself was seized from the possession of complaiant Surendra Verma hence the applicant may be entitled to grant anticipatory bail .

Learned counsel for the State objected and submits that though the case is similar but as per incident of the case is u/s 11 and 13 of the MP Dacoiti Act (AD Act) in which there is specific bar for anticipatory bail.

At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant wants to withdraw this application with direction that on applicant being surrendered before the Court or on he being arrested and brought before the trial Court then the applicant Amit Gupta may be released on bail and his bail application may be considered in the light of order passed in Misc.Cr.

Case no.729/13 on 20.2.2013.

Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case this application is dismissed as withdrawn with this observation that the trial Court may consider bail application u/s 439 Cr.P.C of the applicant if applicant surrendered or brought before the trial Court in the light of order passed in Misc.Cr.

Case no.729/13 on 20.2.2013 in accordance with law.

C c as per rules.

(M.A.Siddiqui ) JUDGE Ag/ 1

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial