ies College of Technology Vs. All India Council for Technical Education

ies College of Technology vs All India Council for Technical Education

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Dec 20, 2012

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1039691

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1039691
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Dec 20, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

ies College of Technology

Advocate Shri. Siddharth Gupta

Respondent

All India Council for Technical Education

Advocate Shri. Pradeep Sharma

Excerpt

1....w.p.no.20220 o”20. 12.2012 shri siddharth gupta, counsel for the petitioner. shri pradeep sharma, counsel for respondent no.1 and 2. learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the respondents may be directed to accept the application of the petitioner for polytechnic diploma (ii shift) course. it is further submitted that earlier a division bench had passed an order by which permission to run the cours.of polytechnic diploma (ii shift) cours.was stayed but that order has been modified and clarified by the division bench so at present there is no bar for applying or for extension of the course. it is submitted that the respondents may be directed to accept the application of the petitioner for extension and/or for fresh grant of approval in respect of polytechnic diploma (ii shift) course. shri sharma, learned counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that subject to decision of this petition, the respondents are ready to accept the aforesaid application. in view of the aforesaid, we direct the respondents to accept the application of the petitioner for extension of the cours.and/or grant of fresh recognition for polytechnic diploma (ii shift) course. this shall be subject to further orders in this petition. this petition be listed for hearing on 5.2.2013. (krishn kumar lahoti) (smt. vimla jain) judge judge vj

Full Judgment

1....W.P.No.20220 o”

20. 12.2012 Shri Siddharth Gupta, Counsel for the petitioner.

Shri Pradeep Sharma, counsel for respondent No.1 and 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the respondents may be directed to accept the application of the petitioner for Polytechnic Diploma (II Shift) Course.

It is further submitted that earlier a Division Bench had passed an order by which permission to run the couRs.of Polytechnic Diploma (II Shift) CouRs.was stayed but that order has been modified and clarified by the Division Bench so at present there is no bar for applying or for extension of the course.

It is submitted that the respondents may be directed to accept the application of the petitioner for extension and/or for fresh grant of approval in respect of Polytechnic Diploma (II Shift) Course.

Shri Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that subject to decision of this petition, the respondents are ready to accept the aforesaid application.

In view of the aforesaid, we direct the respondents to accept the application of the petitioner for extension of the couRs.and/or grant of fresh recognition for Polytechnic Diploma (II Shift) Course.

This shall be subject to further orders in this petition.

This petition be listed for hearing on 5.2.2013.

(Krishn Kumar Lahoti) (Smt.

Vimla Jain) Judge Judge vj

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties ies College of Technology vs All India Council for Technical ... Same Subject Education