Full Judgment
Jitendra Kumar Gautam versus State of M.P.& ORS.Writ Petition No.19662 ”
23. 11.2012: Shri Ajeet Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Petitioner has been selected and empaneled for appointment as Gram Rojgar Sahayak, name of petitioner appears in select list Annexure P-1.
It seems that initially when appointments on the post of Gram Rojgar Sahayak were being made one Smt.
Ragini Sharma challenged the selection process by approaching this Court in W.P.No.8101/2012.
During the pendency of the said writ petition certain development took place, which resulted in appointment of present petitioner, due to aforesaid development the writ petition W.P.No.8101/2012(s) filed by Smt.
Ragini Sharma has been dismissed by this Court on 6.11.2012.
However, on the ground that W.P.No.8101/2012 is still pending, it seems that further proceedings for appointment is being stayed only because the writ petition W.P.NO.8101/2012 was pending and, therefore, petitioner is before this Court.
The order Annexure P-2 passed by the Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Stana indicates that only because the writ petition W.P.NO.8101/2012 (s) is pending he is not proceeding in the matter.
However, as the said writ petition is already dismissed, as indicated hereinabove, on 6.11.2012 the Chief Executive Officer of the Zila Panchayat Satna is directed to proceed in the matter of appointment of Gram Rojgar Sahayak as per selection indicated in the select list in accordance to law and finalize the same at an earlier date.
Action be taken and decision communicated to the petitioner within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
With the aforesaid the petition stands disposed of.
(Rajendra Menon) Judge ss/-