Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mangti Devi Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Mangti Devi vs State of Punjab and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Punjab and Haryana Decided May 10, 2013
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1039539

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mangti Devi

Respondent

State of Punjab and Others

Excerpt

.....for promotion to the post of head teacher from the date her junior-respondent no.5 kulbir kaur was promoted as such and grant her consequential benefits, as has been prayed for in the legal notice dated 7.3.2013 (annexure p-4) within some specified time. in view of the statement made by the counsel for the petitioner and without going into the merit of the case or commenting thereon, the present writ petition is disposed of with directions to respondent nos.1 and 2-secretary to government of punjab, department of school education, punjab and director public instructions (ee).punjab to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner for promotion to the post of head teacher from the date her junior-respondent no.5 kulbir kaur was promoted, as has been prayed for in the legal notice dated 7.3.2013 (annexure p-4) within a period of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. civil writ petition no.10148 of 2013 {3} in case the claim of the petitioner is accepted, the consequential benefits, if any, be released to her, in accordance with law, within a further period of two months. in case the claim of the petitioner is not to be accepted, then a well reasoned and speaking order be passed and conveyed to the petitioner forthwith. may 10, 2013 ( augustine george masih ) ramesh judge

Full Judgment

Civil Writ Petition No.10148 of 2013 {1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: May 10, 2013 Mangti Devi ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH Present: Mr.Harinder Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

***** AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J.(ORAL) Petitioner has approached this Court claiming promotion to the post of Head Teacher from the date her junior, namely, Kulbir Kaur-respondent No.5 was promoted.

It has been asserted that in the feeder cadre, the name of the petitioner, despite she being senior to respondent No.5, never figured.

Petitioner has been approaching the respondents for putting her name in the seniority list and with great efforts, ultimately it was incorporated.

A seniority number was assigned to the petitioner in the year 2009, according to which, she was senior to respondent No.5.

After having been declared as senior, petitioner submitted representations for promotion to the post of Head Teacher from the date her junior has been promoted.

Copies of these representations Civil Writ Petition No.10148 of 2013 {2} have been appended as Annexure P-3 Colly.

None of these representations have been decided by the respondents and, therefore, the petitioner served a legal notice dated 7.3.2013 (Annexure P-4) upon official respondent Nos.1 to 4.

That also has not been decided till date not any response received thereon.

Counsel states that the petitioner, at this stage, would be satisfied if a direction is issued to respondent Nos.1 and 2-Secretary to Government of Punjab, Department of School Education, Punjab and Director Public Instructions (EE).Punjab to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Head Teacher from the date her junior-respondent No.5 Kulbir Kaur was promoted as such and grant her consequential benefits, as has been prayed for in the legal notice dated 7.3.2013 (Annexure P-4) within some specified time.

In view of the statement made by the counsel for the petitioner and without going into the merit of the case or commenting thereon, the present writ petition is disposed of with directions to respondent Nos.1 and 2-Secretary to Government of Punjab, Department of School Education, Punjab and Director Public Instructions (EE).Punjab to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Head Teacher from the date her junior-respondent No.5 Kulbir Kaur was promoted, as has been prayed for in the legal notice dated 7.3.2013 (Annexure P-4) within a period of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

Civil Writ Petition No.10148 of 2013 {3} In case the claim of the petitioner is accepted, the consequential benefits, if any, be released to her, in accordance with law, within a further period of two months.

In case the claim of the petitioner is not to be accepted, then a well reasoned and speaking order be passed and conveyed to the petitioner forthwith.

May 10, 2013 ( AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH ) ramesh JUDGE

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial