Daduram Raikwar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Daduram Raikwar vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Sep 21, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1039241

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1039241
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Sep 21, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Daduram Raikwar

Advocate Shri. Ajit Singh

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

m.c.c.no.1028/12 21.09.2012 heard shri ajit singh, learned counsel for applicants on the application for restoration of w.p.no.9330/12. it is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicants that as he forgot to deposit the court fee, therefore, the default could not be cleared within the stipulated period which resulted in dismissal of the writ petition for non-compliance of peremptory order. the application is supported by an affidavit of the counsel for the applicants and as the reasons stated therein appear to be bona fide, the application for restoration is allowed. the impugned order dated 12.07.2012 passed in w.p.no.9330/12 is recalled and the aforesaid writ petition is directed to be restored to its original number. learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to pay p.f.in the writ petition within seven days for issuance of notice to the respondents informing restoration of the writ petition. m.c.c.stands allowed accordingly. a copy of this order be placed in the record of w.p.no.9330/12. c.c.as per rules. (r.s.jha) judge msp

Full Judgment

M.C.C.No.1028/12 21.09.2012 Heard Shri Ajit Singh, learned counsel for applicants on the application for restoration of W.P.No.9330/12.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicants that as he forgot to deposit the court fee, therefore, the default could not be cleared within the stipulated period which resulted in dismissal of the writ petition for non-compliance of peremptory order.

The application is supported by an affidavit of the counsel for the applicants and as the reasons stated therein appear to be bona fide, the application for restoration is allowed.

The impugned order dated 12.07.2012 passed in W.P.No.9330/12 is recalled and the aforesaid writ petition is directed to be restored to its original number.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to pay P.F.in the writ petition within seven days for issuance of notice to the respondents informing restoration of the writ petition.

M.C.C.stands allowed accordingly.

A copy of this order be placed in the record of W.P.No.9330/12.

C.C.as per rules.

(R.S.Jha) Judge msp

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties Daduram Raikwar vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education