Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

The Chief Mechanical Engineer Vs. Durga Prasad Kewat

The Chief Mechanical Engineer vs Durga Prasad Kewat

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Sep 21, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1039194

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Chief Mechanical Engineer

Advocate Shri. Gaurav Dubey

Respondent

Durga Prasad Kewat

Excerpt

review petition no.691 o”21. 09/2012 shri gaurav dubey, learned counsel for the petitioner. heard. by this petition, the petitioner seeks review of order dated 21-06-2012 passed in writ petition no.2971/2010. it is urged by shri gaurav dubey, learned counsel that earlier shri rajneesh soni, advocate was engaged by the railways to defend them in writ petition no.2971/2010, however, subsequently, the railways engaged him i.e.shri gaurav dubey, as its counsel and though vakalatnama was filed on 22-09-2011, but the same was not brought on record, as such his name was not reflected. it is accordingly urged that the name of shri gaurav dubey, advocate be mentioned in the order sheet dated 21-06-2012. after hearing the learned counsel and perusing the record, we allow this application as it is shri gaurav dubey, advocate whose name ought to have been mentioned in the order dated 21- 06-2012. the order is corrected accordingly. review petition is finally disposed of in above terms.c.c.as per rules. (ajit singh) (sanjay yadav) judge judge sc

Full Judgment

Review Petition No.691 o”

21. 09/2012 Shri Gaurav Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Heard.

By this petition, the petitioner seeks review of order dated 21-06-2012 passed in Writ Petition No.2971/2010.

It is urged by Shri Gaurav Dubey, learned counsel that earlier Shri Rajneesh Soni, Advocate was engaged by the Railways to defend them in Writ Petition No.2971/2010, however, subsequently, the Railways engaged him i.e.Shri Gaurav Dubey, as its counsel and though Vakalatnama was filed on 22-09-2011, but the same was not brought on record, as such his name was not reflected.

It is accordingly urged that the name of Shri Gaurav Dubey, Advocate be mentioned in the order sheet dated 21-06-2012.

After hearing the learned counsel and perusing the record, we allow this application as it is Shri Gaurav Dubey, Advocate whose name ought to have been mentioned in the order dated 21- 06-2012.

The order is corrected accordingly.

Review Petition is finally disposed of in above terMs.C.C.as per rules.

(AJIT SINGH) (SANJAY YADAV) JUDGE JUDGE sc

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial