Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Komal Patel Vs. Munnilal Patel

Komal Patel vs Munnilal Patel

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Feb 01, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1038924

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Komal Patel

Advocate Shri. P.N.Tiwari

Respondent

Munnilal Patel

Excerpt

1 01/2/2013 shri umakant sharma, senior counsel with shri p.n.tiwari, counsel for the petitioner. this petition has been preferred under section 482 of cr.p.c, for quashment of order dated 26.11.12 passed by the additional sessions judge, anupur in criminal revision no.43/11, setting aside the order dated 8.7.2011 passed by s.d.m anupur by which possession of the petitioner was protected and respondent was restrained from making disturbance in it. let notice of this petition be issued to respondent by rad. steps within three working days. notice be made returnable within three weeks. list the matter in the week commencing from 11/3/2013. in view of the fact that the court of sdm on perusal of statement of petitioner and his witnesses prima facie possession was found in his favour, operation of the impugned order shall remain stayed and parties are directed to maintain status quo till the next date of listing of the matter. 2 cc as per rules. (tarun kumar kaushal) judge dcs/-

Full Judgment

1 01/2/2013 Shri Umakant Sharma, Senior Counsel with Shri P.N.Tiwari, counsel for the petitioner.

This petition has been preferred under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, for quashment of order dated 26.11.12 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Anupur in Criminal Revision No.43/11, setting aside the order dated 8.7.2011 passed by S.D.M Anupur by which possession of the petitioner was protected and respondent was restrained from making disturbance in it.

Let notice of this petition be issued to respondent by RAD.

Steps within three working days.

Notice be made returnable within three weeks.

List the matter in the week commencing from 11/3/2013.

In view of the fact that the Court of SDM on perusal of statement of petitioner and his witnesses prima facie possession was found in his favour, operation of the impugned order shall remain stayed and parties are directed to maintain status quo till the next date of listing of the matter.

2 CC as per rules.

(Tarun Kumar Kaushal) JUDGE dcs/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial