Ajit Kumar Vs. Barkatullah University

Ajit Kumar vs Barkatullah University

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Feb 01, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1038902

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1038902
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Feb 01, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ajit Kumar

Advocate Shri. R.D.Ahirwar

Respondent

Barkatullah University

Advocate Shri. Mahendra Pateria

Excerpt

1 w.p.no.5512/2012 ajit kumar & another barkatullah university & others 1.2.2013 shri r.d.ahirwar, counsel for petitioners.shri mahendra pateria, counsel for respondents no.1 & 2. shri pateria, learned counsel appearing for respondents no.1 and 2 submits that he has received instructions in the matter and as per his instructions, petitioners were not permitted to appear in the examinations because as per university, they had not deposited the fees. however, on an enquiry, it was revealed that petitioners had deposited their fees with respondent no.3 college which were subsequently transmitted to the university. not the petitioners have been permitted to appear in the examinations as directed in this petition on 20.4.2012. respondents no.1 & 2 are ready to declare result of the petitioners.in view of aforesaid statement made by shri pateria, no further order is required. respondents no.1 & 2 are permitted to declare result of the examinations namely m.ed. in which petitioners has appeared in compliance of our order dated 20.4.2012. with the aforesaid directions, this petition is finally disposed of, with no order as to costs. c.c.as per rules. (krishn kumar lahoti) (m.a.siddiqui) judge judge c.

Full Judgment

1 W.P.No.5512/2012 Ajit Kumar & another Barkatullah University & others 1.2.2013 Shri R.D.Ahirwar, Counsel for petitioneRs.Shri Mahendra Pateria, Counsel for respondents No.1 & 2.

Shri Pateria, learned counsel appearing for respondents No.1 and 2 submits that he has received instructions in the matter and as per his instructions, petitioners were not permitted to appear in the examinations because as per University, they had not deposited the fees.

However, on an enquiry, it was revealed that petitioners had deposited their fees with respondent No.3 College which were subsequently transmitted to the University.

not the petitioners have been permitted to appear in the examinations as directed in this petition on 20.4.2012.

Respondents No.1 & 2 are ready to declare result of the petitioneRs.In view of aforesaid statement made by Shri Pateria, no further order is required.

Respondents No.1 & 2 are permitted to declare result of the examinations namely M.Ed.

in which petitioners has appeared in compliance of our order dated 20.4.2012.

With the aforesaid directions, this petition is finally disposed of, with no order as to costs.

C.C.as per rules.

(Krishn Kumar Lahoti) (M.A.Siddiqui) Judge Judge C.

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Ajit Kumar vs Barkatullah University Same Subject Education