Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Kunwar Patel Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Kunwar Patel vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided May 06, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1038804

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Kunwar Patel

Advocate Shri. Dharmendra Soni

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

kunwar patel & anr. versus state of m.p.& ors.writ petition no.8325 ”6. 5.2013: shri dharmendra soni, learned counsel for the petitioners.applications filed by the petitioner under section 110 of the m.p.land revenue code seeking mutation are pending before respondent no.3 since 10.8.2010 and pointed out that the said applications are not being considered and decided, this writ petition has been filed. taking note of the aforesaid grievance of petitioner it is directed that on petitioner's filing a certified copy of this order along with relevant documents, respondent no.3, the competent revisional authority shall decide the applications filed under section 110 in accordance to law after hearing all concerned within a period of 3 months. with the aforesaid the petition stands allowed and disposed of. (rajendra menon) judge ss/-

Full Judgment

Kunwar Patel & Anr.

versus State of M.P.& ORS.Writ Petition No.8325 ”

6. 5.2013: Shri Dharmendra Soni, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Applications filed by the petitioner under Section 110 of the M.P.Land Revenue code seeking mutation are pending before respondent No.3 since 10.8.2010 and pointed out that the said applications are not being considered and decided, this writ petition has been filed.

Taking note of the aforesaid grievance of petitioner it is directed that on petitioner's filing a certified copy of this order along with relevant documents, respondent No.3, the competent revisional authority shall decide the applications filed under Section 110 in accordance to law after hearing all concerned within a period of 3 months.

With the aforesaid the petition stands allowed and disposed of.

(Rajendra Menon) Judge ss/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial