Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Prashant Kumar Gupta Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Prashant Kumar Gupta vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Nov 21, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1038698

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Prashant Kumar Gupta

Advocate Shri. Deepak Okhade

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

1 w.p.no.17902/2012 prashant kumar gupta & anot versus state of m.p.& ors.21.11.2012 heard shri deepak okhade learned counsel for the petitioners on the question of admission and interim relief. the petitioners have filed this petition praying for police protection on account of the fact that they have entered into an intercaste marriage. it is, however, apparent from a perusal of the petition and the documents filed alongwith the same that there is no threat to the petitioners either from the respondent no.4 or anybody not have the petitioners filed any complaint in this regard before the police authorities. in the circumstances, it is apparent that the petition has been filed by the petitioners only on apprehension without their being any substance in the same. in view of the aforesaid, the petition filed by the petitioners is, accordingly, dismissed. the petitioners.as and when occasion arises, may approach the police authorities. c.c as per rules. ( r.s.jha ) judge mms/-

Full Judgment

1 W.P.No.17902/2012 Prashant Kumar Gupta & Anot versus State of M.P.& ORS.21.11.2012 Heard Shri Deepak Okhade learned counsel for the petitioners on the question of admission and interim relief.

The petitioners have filed this petition praying for police protection on account of the fact that they have entered into an intercaste marriage.

It is, however, apparent from a perusal of the petition and the documents filed alongwith the same that there is no threat to the petitioners either from the respondent no.4 or anybody not have the petitioners filed any complaint in this regard before the police authorities.

In the circumstances, it is apparent that the petition has been filed by the petitioners only on apprehension without their being any substance in the same.

In view of the aforesaid, the petition filed by the petitioners is, accordingly, dismissed.

The petitioneRs.as and when occasion arises, may approach the police authorities.

C.C as per rules.

( R.S.JHA ) JUDGE mms/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial