Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ridens Vs. Illinois

Ridens vs illinois

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1975
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/103862

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
421 U.S. 993
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ridens

Respondent

illinois

Excerpt

ridens v. illinois - 421 u.s. 993 (1975) u.s. supreme court ridens v. illinois , 421 u.s. 993 (1975) 421 u.s. 993 frank c. ridens et al. v. state of illinois et al. no. 74-1003. supreme court of the united states may 27, 1975 on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of illinois. the petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. mr. justice brennan, with whom mr. justice stewart and mr. justice marshall join, dissenting. petitioners were convicted of selling allegedly obscene publications in violation of the illinois obscenity statute, ill.rev.stat.1969, c. 38, 11-20, and the obscenity ordinance of the city of moline, illinois. the illinois supreme court affirmed their convictions. 51 ill.2d 410, 282 n.e. 2d 691 (1972). we granted the petition for certiorari and remanded the case for further consideration in light of miller v. california, 413 u.s. 15 (1973). page 421 u.s. 993 , 994 413 u.s. 912 (1973). on remand, the illinois supreme court again affirmed the convictions. for the reasons stated in my dissent from the remand of this case, 413 u.s. 912, and because the present judgment was rendered after miller, i would grant the petition and reverse.* mr. justice douglas, being of the view that any state or federal ban on, or regulation of, obscenity is prohibited by the constitution, roth v. united states, 354 u.s. 476 , 508-514 (1957); miller v. california, 413 u.s. 15 , 42-47 ( 1973); paris adult theatre i v. slaton, 413 u.s. 49 , 70-73 (1973), would grant certiorari and summarily reverse. footnotes [ footnote * ] although four of us would grant and reverse, the justices who join this opinion do not insist that the case be decided on the merits.

Full Judgment

RIDENS v. ILLINOIS - 421 U.S. 993 (1975)
U.S. Supreme Court RIDENS v. ILLINOIS , 421 U.S. 993 (1975)

421 U.S. 993

Frank C. RIDENS et al.
v.
State of ILLINOIS et al.
No. 74-1003.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 27, 1975

On petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Illinois.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

Mr. Justice BRENNAN, with whom Mr. Justice STEWART and Mr. Justice MARSHALL join, dissenting.

Petitioners were convicted of selling allegedly obscene publications in violation of the Illinois Obscenity Statute, Ill.Rev.Stat.1969, c. 38, 11-20, and the obscenity ordinance of the city of Moline, Illinois. The Illinois Supreme Court affirmed their convictions. 51 Ill.2d 410, 282 N.E. 2d 691 (1972). We granted the petition for certiorari and remanded the case for further consideration in light of Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973).

Page 421 U.S. 993 , 994

413 U.S. 912 (1973). On remand, the Illinois Supreme Court again affirmed the convictions.

For the reasons stated in my dissent from the remand of this case, 413 U.S. 912, and because the present judgment was rendered after Miller, I would grant the petition and reverse.*

Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, being of the view that any state or federal ban on, or regulation of, obscenity is prohibited by the Constitution, Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 , 508-514 (1957); Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 , 42-47 ( 1973); Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U.S. 49 , 70-73 (1973), would grant certiorari and summarily reverse. Footnotes

[ Footnote * ] Although four of us would grant and reverse, the Justices who join this opinion do not insist that the case be decided on the merits.



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial