Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Rahul Vs. State

Rahul vs State

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Sep 19, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1037134

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rahul

Respondent

State

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi reserved on :26. h august, 2013 decided on :19. h september, 2013 + crl.a. 369/2009 rahul through : ..... appellant mr.prashant mendiratta, advocate with mr.ashish singh, advocate. versus state through : ..... respondent mr.m.n.dudeja, app. coram: mr. justice s.p.garg s.p.garg, j.the present appeal is allowed in terms of a detailed common judgment delivered today which is placed in the crl.a.no.261/2010 titled gaurav @ vicky vs. state . (s.p.garg) judge september 19, 2013 sa file of

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :

26. h August, 2013 DECIDED ON :

19. h September, 2013 + CRL.A. 369/2009 RAHUL Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Prashant Mendiratta, Advocate with Mr.Ashish Singh, Advocate. versus STATE Through : ..... Respondent Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.

The present appeal is allowed in terms of a detailed common judgment delivered today which is placed in the Crl.A.No.261/2010 titled Gaurav @ Vicky Vs. State . (S.P.GARG) JUDGE September 19, 2013 sa file of

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2013 Same Parties Rahul vs State Same Subject Education Same Judge S. P. Garg
Education

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales