State of Rajasthan Vs. Nathi Singh

State of Rajasthan vs Nathi Singh

Type Court Judgment Court Supreme Court of India Decided Jan 29, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1036415

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1036415
Court: Supreme Court of India
Judge: H.L. Dattu and Ranjan Gogoi
Decided On: Jan 29, 2013
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue: Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

State of Rajasthan

Respondent

Nathi Singh

Excerpt

.....on record and in our considered view, the high court and the trial court have not committed any error which would call for our interference. accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. criminal appeal no.645/2008:1. mr. abhishek, learned counsel appearing for the appellant would inform us, that, since the accused did not get bail from this court, he must have served out the sentence that was imposed by the trial court and confirmed by the high court for the offences punishable under sections 365 and 384 of the indian penal code, 1860 (“the ipc” for short).2. in view of the above, in our opinion, nothing survives in this appeal for our consideration and decision. therefore, the appeal is disposed of as having become infructuous. .......................j.(h.l. dattu) .......................j.(ranjan gogoi) new delhi; january 29 2013 item no.105 court no.6 section ii s u p r e m e c o u r t o f i n d i a record of proceedings criminal appeal no(s). 644 of 200.state of rajasthan appellant (s) versus nathi singh respondent(s) (with office report ) with crl.appeal no.645 of 2008 (with office report) date:29. 01/2013 these appeals were called on for hearing today. coram : hon'ble mr. justice h.l. dattu hon'ble mr. justice ranjan gogoi for appellant(s)/ mr.jasbir singh malik, aag respondent-state mr.varun punia, adv. for ms. pragati neekhra,adv. mr.abhishek, adv. for mr. ambar qamaruddin for respondent(s) mr. harbans lal bajaj,adv.(np) upon hearing counsel the court made the following order criminal appeal no.644/2008 is dismissed and criminal appeal no.645/2008 is dismissed having become infructuous, in terms of the signed order. (g.v.ramana) (vinot kulvi) court master court master (signed order is placed on the file) ----------------------- 3

Full Judgment

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.644 OF 200.STATE OF RAJASTHAN ...APPELLANT VERSUS NATHI SINGH ...RESPONDENT WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.645/2008 NATHI SINGH ...APPELLANT VERSUS STATE OF RAJASTHAN ...RESPONDENT ORDER

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.644/2008:

1. This appeal is filed against the judgment and order in D.B. Criminal Appeal No.119 of 2004 of the High Court of Rajasthan at Jaipur, dated 24.11.2005, whereby and whereunder the High Court has allowed the appeal of the respondent-Nathi Singh.

2. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties.

3. We have carefully perused the records and analysed the evidence on record and in our considered view, the High Court and the trial court have not committed any error which would call for our interference. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.645/2008:

1. Mr. Abhishek, learned counsel appearing for the appellant would inform us, that, since the accused did not get bail from this Court, he must have served out the sentence that was imposed by the Trial Court and confirmed by the High Court for the offences punishable under Sections 365 and 384 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (“the IPC” for short).

2. In view of the above, in our opinion, nothing survives in this appeal for our consideration and decision. Therefore, the appeal is disposed of as having become infructuous. .......................J.(H.L. DATTU) .......................J.(RANJAN GOGOI) NEW DELHI; JANUARY 29 2013 ITEM NO.105 COURT NO.6 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(s). 644 OF 200.STATE OF RAJASTHAN Appellant (s) VERSUS NATHI SINGH Respondent(s) (With office report ) WITH CRL.APPEAL No.645 of 2008 (With office report) Date:

29. 01/2013 These Appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI For Appellant(s)/ Mr.Jasbir Singh Malik, AAG Respondent-State Mr.Varun Punia, Adv. for Ms. Pragati Neekhra,Adv. Mr.Abhishek, Adv. For Mr. Ambar Qamaruddin For Respondent(s) Mr. Harbans Lal Bajaj,Adv.(NP) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following ORDER

Criminal Appeal No.644/2008 is dismissed and Criminal Appeal No.645/2008 is dismissed having become infructuous, in terms of the signed order. (G.V.Ramana) (Vinot Kulvi) Court Master Court Master (signed order is placed on the file) ----------------------- 3

Same Court & Year Supreme Court of India · 2013 Same Parties State of Rajasthan vs Nathi Singh Same Subject Criminal Same Judge H.L. Dattu and Ranjan Gogoi