Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Thompson Vs. U.S

Thompson vs U.S

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1973
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/103400

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
414 U.S. 918
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Thompson

Respondent

U.S

Excerpt

thompson v. u.s - 414 u.s. 918 (1973) u.s. supreme court thompson v. u.s , 414 u.s. 918 (1973) 414 u.s. 918 waverly thompson v. united states. no. 72-1498. supreme court of the united states october 15, 1973 on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the seventh circuit. the petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. mr. justice douglas, dissenting. the petitioner here was convicted in district court of conspiring to transport forged securities in interstate commerce, 18 u.s.c. 2314, and of aiding and abetting the substantive crime. the trial judge's instruction to the jury did not clearly require that they find that defendant had knowledge of the interstate character of the transaction. regardless of whether the substantive count requires such knowledge, it seems clear that page 414 u.s. 918 , 919 the conspiracy offense would. see the opinion of judge learned hand in united states v. crimmins, 123 f.2d 271, 273 (ca2 1941). moreover, here as in barnes v. united states, 412 u.s. 837 ( 1973), we deal with an offense traditionally treated as a local law question; it becomes federal only through the nexus with interstate commerce. see my dissenting opinion in barnes v. united states, supra, at 848. proof of that nexus is therefore required for conviction. i would grant certiorari. mr. justice stewart would grant certiorari and set the case for oral argument.

Full Judgment

THOMPSON v. U.S - 414 U.S. 918 (1973)
U.S. Supreme Court THOMPSON v. U.S , 414 U.S. 918 (1973)

414 U.S. 918

Waverly THOMPSON
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 72-1498.

Supreme Court of the United States

October 15, 1973

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, dissenting.

The petitioner here was convicted in district court of conspiring to transport forged securities in interstate commerce, 18 U.S.C. 2314, and of aiding and abetting the substantive crime. The trial judge's instruction to the jury did not clearly require that they find that defendant had knowledge of the interstate character of the transaction. Regardless of whether the substantive count requires such knowledge, it seems clear that

Page 414 U.S. 918 , 919

the conspiracy offense would. See the opinion of Judge Learned Hand in United States v. Crimmins, 123 F.2d 271, 273 (CA2 1941). Moreover, here as in Barnes v. United States, 412 U.S. 837 ( 1973), we deal with an offense traditionally treated as a local law question; it becomes federal only through the nexus with interstate commerce. See my dissenting opinion in Barnes v. United States, supra, at 848. Proof of that nexus is therefore required for conviction. I would grant certiorari.

Mr. Justice STEWART would grant certiorari and set the case for oral argument.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial