Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Aikens Vs. California

Aikens vs California

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-07-1972
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/103026

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
406 U.S. 813
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Aikens

Respondent

California

Excerpt

aikens v. california - 406 u.s. 813 (1972) u.s. supreme court aikens v. california, 406 u.s. 813 (1972) aikens v. california no. 68-5027 argued january 17, 1972 decided june 7, 1972 406 u.s. 813 certiorari to the supreme court of california syllabus california supreme court decision invalidating death penalty under state constitution has mooted this case, where certiorari was granted to consider whether death penalty comports with federal constitution. 70 cal.2d 369, 450 p.2d 258, certiorari dismissed. page 406 u. s. 814 per curiam. petitioner in this case, which has been orally argued and is now sub judice, has filed a suggestion of mootness and motion for remand based on the intervening decision of the california supreme court in people v. anderson, 6 cal.3d 628, 493 p.2d 880 (1972). that decision declared capital punishment in california unconstitutional under art. 1, § 6, of the state constitution. the decision rested on an adequate state ground, and the state's petition for writ of certiorari was denied. 406 u. s. 98 . the california supreme court declared in the anderson case that its decision was fully retroactive, and stated that any prisoner currently under sentence of death could petition a superior court to modify its judgment. petitioner thus no longer faces a realistic threat of execution, and the issue on which certiorari was granted -- the constitutionality of the death penalty under the federal constitution -- is now moot in his case. accordingly, the writ of certiorari is dismissed.

Full Judgment

Aikens v. California - 406 U.S. 813 (1972)
U.S. Supreme Court Aikens v. California, 406 U.S. 813 (1972)

Aikens v. California

No. 68-5027

Argued January 17, 1972

Decided June 7, 1972

406 U.S. 813

CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA

SYLLABUS

California Supreme Court decision invalidating death penalty under state constitution has mooted this case, where certiorari was granted to consider whether death penalty comports with Federal Constitution.

70 Cal.2d 369, 450 P.2d 258, certiorari dismissed.

Page 406 U. S. 814

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner in this case, which has been orally argued and is now sub judice, has filed a Suggestion of Mootness and Motion for Remand based on the intervening decision of the California Supreme Court in People v. Anderson, 6 Cal.3d 628, 493 P.2d 880 (1972). That decision declared capital punishment in California unconstitutional under Art. 1, § 6, of the state constitution. The decision rested on an adequate state ground, and the State's petition for writ of certiorari was denied. 406 U. S. 98 . The California Supreme Court declared in the Anderson case that its decision was fully retroactive, and stated that any prisoner currently under sentence of death could petition a superior court to modify its judgment. Petitioner thus no longer faces a realistic threat of execution, and the issue on which certiorari was granted -- the constitutionality of the death penalty under the Federal Constitution -- is now moot in his case. Accordingly, the writ of certiorari is dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial