Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rivas Vs. Cozens

Rivas vs Cozens

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Nov-13-1972
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/102952

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
409 U.S. 55
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rivas

Respondent

Cozens

Excerpt

rivas v. cozens - 409 u.s. 55 (1972) u.s. supreme court rivas v. cozens, 409 u.s. 55 (1972) 409 u.s. 55 rivas et al. v. cozens, director, department of motor vehicles of california, et al. appeal from the united states district court for the northern district of california no. 71-5780. decided november 13, 1972 vacated and remanded. see: 327 f. supp. 867. per curiam. the appellants' supplemental brief filed october 14, 1972, recites: "the california supreme court's decision in rios [v. cozens, 7 cal. 3d 792, 499 p.2d 979 (1972),] has been given full prospective and retroactive effect. cal. sup. ct. order denying stay pending appeal, filed august 30, 1972. accordingly, the individual petitioners herein, celestino v. rivas and zeferino samaniego, have now been accorded the opportunity for a personal evidentiary hearing regarding the suspension of their driver's licenses." accordingly the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, the judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the united states district court for the northern district of california to determine whether this case has become moot. page 409 u.s. 55, 56

Full Judgment

RIVAS v. COZENS - 409 U.S. 55 (1972)
U.S. Supreme Court RIVAS v. COZENS, 409 U.S. 55 (1972) 409 U.S. 55

RIVAS ET AL. v. COZENS, DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES OF
CALIFORNIA, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
No. 71-5780.

Decided November 13, 1972

Vacated and remanded. See: 327 F. Supp. 867.

PER CURIAM.

The appellants' supplemental brief filed October 14, 1972, recites:

    "The California Supreme Court's decision in Rios [v. Cozens, 7 Cal. 3d 792, 499 P.2d 979 (1972),] has been given full prospective and retroactive effect. Cal. Sup. Ct. Order Denying Stay Pending Appeal, filed August 30, 1972. Accordingly, the individual petitioners herein, Celestino V. Rivas and Zeferino Samaniego, have now been accorded the opportunity for a personal evidentiary hearing regarding the suspension of their driver's licenses."

Accordingly the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, the judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to determine whether this case has become moot.

Page 409 U.S. 55, 56



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial