Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Radich Vs. New York

Radich vs New York

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Mar-24-1971
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/102859

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
401 U.S. 531
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Radich

Respondent

New York

Excerpt

radich v. new york - 401 u.s. 531 (1971) u.s. supreme court radich v. new york, 401 u.s. 531 (1971) 401 u.s. 531 radich v. new york appeal from the court of appeals of new york no. 169. argued february 22, 1971 decided march 24, 1971 26 n. y. 2d 114, 257 n. e. 2d 30, affirmed by an equally divided court. richard g. green argued the cause for appellant. with him on the briefs were shirley fingerhood and melvin l. wulf. michael r. juviler argued the cause for appellee. with him on the brief were frank s. hogan and william c. donnino. john b. hightower et al. filed a brief as amicus curiae urging reversal. louis j. lefkowitz, attorney general, pro se, samuel a. hirshowitz, first assistant attorney general, and maria l. marcus, assistant attorney general, filed a brief for the attorney general of new york as amicus curiae urging affirmance. per curiam. the judgment is affirmed by an equally divided court. mr. justice douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. page 401 u.s. 531, 532

Full Judgment

RADICH v. NEW YORK - 401 U.S. 531 (1971)
U.S. Supreme Court RADICH v. NEW YORK, 401 U.S. 531 (1971) 401 U.S. 531

RADICH v. NEW YORK
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK
No. 169.
Argued February 22, 1971
Decided March 24, 1971

26 N. Y. 2d 114, 257 N. E. 2d 30, affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Richard G. Green argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Shirley Fingerhood and Melvin L. Wulf.

Michael R. Juviler argued the cause for appellee. With him on the brief were Frank S. Hogan and William C. Donnino.

John B. Hightower et al. filed a brief as amicus curiae urging reversal.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General, pro se, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Maria L. Marcus, Assistant Attorney General, filed a brief for the Attorney General of New York as amicus curiae urging affirmance.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 401 U.S. 531, 532



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial