Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Sitaram Singh Vs. the State of Bihar and ors

Sitaram Singh vs The State of Bihar and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided Aug 23, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1028514

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Narcotics

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Narcotics

Key legal issue
Narcotics

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sitaram Singh

Respondent

The State of Bihar and ors

Excerpt

.....of village makhmilpur, p.s. karpi, district- jehanabad. .... .... respondent/s =========================================================== appearance : for the petitioner/s : mr. rajiv ranjan sinha for the respondent no.1 to 4: mr. gp 6 for the respondent no. 5 to 16: mr. arvind kr.verma =========================================================== coram: honourable mr. justice birendra prasad verma oral judgment date:23. 08-2013 by the impugned order dated 30.04.1992 (annexure-6) passed in consolidation revision case no. 255 of 1984/3 of 1990 by the respondent joint director of consolidation, gaya, claim of the petitioner with respect to the lands in question has been rejected by a patna high court cwjc no.6266 of 1992 dt.23-08-2013 2/2 reasoned and speaking order and order dated 26.04.1984(annexure-5) passed in consolidation appeal no. 49/1979-80/ 99/1983-84 by the respondent assistant director of consolidation, has been affirmed. apparently, by concurrent finding of facts recorded by the appellate authority as also the revisional authority, the claim of the petitioner with respect to the lands under dispute has been rejected. no case for interference is made out. the writ petition stands dismissed. (birendra prasad verma, j) btiwary/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6266 of 1992 =========================================================== Sitaram Singh son of late Rupan Singh, a resident of village- Makhmilpur, P.S. Karpi, District- Gaya. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Joint Director of Consolidation, Gaya 3. Assistant Director of Consolidation, Gaya.

4. Consolidation Officer, Karpi (Kochhasa Camp) Jehanabad.

5. Nageshwari Devi wife of late Kobhal Singh, a resident of village- Makhmilpur, P.S. Karpi, District- Jehanad.

6. Kamla Devi wife of Ramyatan Singh, a resident of village- Amarpura, P.O. Dulhin Bazar, District-Patna.

7. Sonma Devi wife of Rampyare Singh, resident of village- Chiksi Bala, P.S. Paliganj, District Patna.

8. Chandramania Devi wife of Ramnath Singh, a resident of village, P.O. & P.S. Sigori, District Patna.

9. Chinta Devi wife of Ramnath Singh, a resident of village, P.O. & P.S. Kurtha, District Jehanabad.

10. Dukhdewan Singh son of Hanuman Singh, a resident of village- Makhmilpur, P.S. Karpi, District- Jehanabad.

11. Krishna Singh 12. Dilip Singh 13. Indel Singh, all sons of late Ramawadh Singh, all residents of Village Shankarpur, P.S. Karipi, District Jehanabad.

14. Morwa Devi wife of Ramdahin Singh, a resident of village Harhia, Bag, P.S. Karpi, District Jehanabad, at present residing at village Makhmilpur, P.S. Karpi, District Jehanabad.

15. Mahanand Singh, son of Chandardip Singh.

16. Raghunandan Singh son of Ramratan Singh, both residents of village Makhmilpur, P.S. Karpi, District- Jehanabad. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Sinha For the Respondent No.1 to 4: Mr. GP 6 For the Respondent no. 5 to 16: Mr. Arvind Kr.Verma =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL JUDGMENT

Date:

23. 08-2013 By the impugned order dated 30.04.1992 (Annexure-6) passed in Consolidation Revision Case no. 255 of 1984/3 of 1990 by the respondent Joint Director of Consolidation, Gaya, claim of the petitioner with respect to the lands in question has been rejected by a Patna High Court CWJC No.6266 of 1992 dt.23-08-2013 2/2 reasoned and speaking order and order dated 26.04.1984(Annexure-5) passed in Consolidation Appeal No. 49/1979-80/ 99/1983-84 by the respondent Assistant Director of Consolidation, has been affirmed. Apparently, by concurrent finding of facts recorded by the appellate authority as also the revisional authority, the claim of the petitioner with respect to the lands under dispute has been rejected. No case for interference is made out. The writ petition stands dismissed. (Birendra Prasad Verma, J) BTiwary/-

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Patna · 2013 Same Parties Sitaram Singh vs The State of Bihar and ors Same Subject Narcotics
Narcotics

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales