Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Anil Kumar Singh and ors Vs. State of Bihar and anr

Anil Kumar Singh and ors vs State of Bihar and anr

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided Aug 22, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1028464

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Anil Kumar Singh and ors

Respondent

State of Bihar and anr

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.54927 of 2007 =========================================================== 1. anil kumar singh s/o vijay singh 2. gita devi @ priya devi @ priya singh w/o anil kumar singh 3. vijay singh s/o late ramhin singh 4. shanti devi w/o vijay singh, all r.o vill. gorsar, p.o. and p.s. ghost, district jehanabad .... .... petitioner/s versus 1. the state of bihar 2. sanyukta devi @ mala devi w/o anil singh, r/o vill. gorsar, p.s. ghost, distt. jehanabad .... .... opposite party/s =========================================================== appearance : for the petitioner/s : mr. sabir alam, advocate for the opposite party/s : dr. indiwar kumari, a.p.p. =========================================================== coram: honourable justice smt. anjana prakash oral judgment date:22. 08-2013 the petitioners seek quashing of the entire proceeding including the order of cognizance dated 19.11.2007 passed by the s.d.j.m., jehanabad in complaint case no.859 of 2007 (trial no.1835 of 2007). the case of the complainant is that she was married with the petitioner no.1 in the year 1994 but the accused persons started to demand extra dowry, on account of which she was tortured and thrown out of her matrimonial home. it has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the complainant was never married to the petitioner no.1, who in fact is married to petitioner no.2, for this reason when repeated notices were sent to her by this court she did not respond to them. in view of such patna high court cr.misc. no.54927 of 2007 dt.22-08-2013 2 false allegation the prosecution may be set aside. considering such aspect of the matter, the application is allowed and the entire proceeding including the order dated 19.11.2007 passed by the s.d.j.m., jehanabad in complaint case no.859 of 2007 (trial no.1835 of 2007) is hereby set aside. (anjana prakash, j) nafr/narendra/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.54927 of 2007 =========================================================== 1. Anil Kumar Singh S/o Vijay Singh 2. Gita Devi @ Priya Devi @ Priya Singh w/o Anil Kumar Singh 3. Vijay Singh S/o late Ramhin Singh 4. Shanti Devi w/o Vijay Singh, All R.o vill. Gorsar, P.O. and P.S. Ghost, District Jehanabad .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Sanyukta Devi @ Mala Devi w/o Anil Singh, R/o vill. Gorsar, P.S. Ghost, Distt. Jehanabad .... .... Opposite Party/s =========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sabir Alam, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Dr. Indiwar Kumari, A.P.P. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL JUDGMENT

Date:

22. 08-2013 The Petitioners seek quashing of the entire proceeding including the order of cognizance dated 19.11.2007 passed by the S.D.J.M., Jehanabad in Complaint case No.859 of 2007 (Trial No.1835 of 2007). The case of the Complainant is that she was married with the Petitioner No.1 in the year 1994 but the accused persons started to demand extra dowry, on account of which she was tortured and thrown out of her matrimonial home. It has been submitted on behalf of the Petitioners that the Complainant was never married to the Petitioner No.1, who in fact is married to Petitioner No.2, for this reason when repeated notices were sent to her by this Court she did not respond to them. In view of such Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54927 of 2007 dt.22-08-2013 2 false allegation the prosecution may be set aside. Considering such aspect of the matter, the application is allowed and the entire proceeding including the order dated 19.11.2007 passed by the S.D.J.M., Jehanabad in Complaint case No.859 of 2007 (Trial No.1835 of 2007) is hereby set aside. (Anjana Prakash, J) NAFR/Narendra/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial