Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mammen Methew and ors Vs. State of Bihar and anr

Mammen Methew and ors vs State of Bihar and anr

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided Aug 21, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1028428

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mammen Methew and ors

Respondent

State of Bihar and anr

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no. 44181 of 2008 ============================================================== 1. mammen methew, resident editor, the hindustan times ltd., budhmarg, patna.2. mirnal pandey, editor, hindustan, 18/20, kasturbagandhi marg, new delhi.3. sunil dubey, local editor, hindustan mudhmarg, patna.4. rakesh sharma, publisher, h.t. media ltd., 18/20 kasturbagandhi marg, new delhi. .... .... petitioner/s versus 1. the state of bihar 2. bihar industrial area development authority office at indira bhawan, 6th floor ramcharitar path, boring road, through its assistant development officer(biada) indu bhushan. .... .... opposite party/s ============================================================== appearance : for the petitioner/s : mr. k.n. gupta, adv. mr. satyendra krishna pd., adv. for the state : mr. c. jawahar, a.p.p. for the biada : mr. kumar priyaranjan, adv. ======================================================== coram: honourable justice smt. anjana prakash oral judgment date 21.08.2013 anjana prakash, j: heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the state.2. the petitioners seek quashing of the entire proceeding including the order of cognizance dated 10.7.2007 passed by the chief judicial magistrate, patna, in complaint case no. 2149(m) of 2007.3. in view of the submission made in paragraph- 23 of the counter affidavit filed today that the officials of biada have decided to compromise the matter, the entire proceeding including the order of cognizance dated 10.7.2007 passed by the chief judicial magistrate, patna, in complaint case no. 2149(m) of 2007 is, hereby, quashed.4. the application stands allowed. (anjana prakash, j.) patna high court, patna dated, the 21st august, 2013 nafr/s.ali

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 44181 of 2008 ============================================================== 1. Mammen Methew, Resident Editor, The Hindustan Times Ltd., Budhmarg, Patna.

2. Mirnal Pandey, Editor, Hindustan, 18/20, Kasturbagandhi Marg, New Delhi.

3. Sunil Dubey, local Editor, Hindustan Mudhmarg, Patna.

4. Rakesh Sharma, Publisher, H.T. Media Ltd., 18/20 Kasturbagandhi Marg, New Delhi. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority Office at Indira Bhawan, 6th Floor Ramcharitar Path, Boring Road, through its Assistant Development Officer(BIADA) Indu Bhushan. .... .... Opposite Party/s ============================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. K.N. Gupta, Adv. Mr. Satyendra Krishna Pd., Adv. For the State : Mr. C. Jawahar, A.P.P. For the BIADA : Mr. Kumar Priyaranjan, Adv. ======================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL JUDGMENT

Date 21.08.2013 Anjana Prakash, J: Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and the State.

2. The Petitioners seek quashing of the entire proceeding including the order of cognizance dated 10.7.2007 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna, in Complaint Case No. 2149(M) of 2007.

3. In view of the submission made in paragraph- 23 of the counter affidavit filed today that the Officials of BIADA have decided to compromise the matter, the entire proceeding including the order of cognizance dated 10.7.2007 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna, in Complaint Case No. 2149(M) of 2007 is, hereby, quashed.

4. The application stands allowed. (Anjana Prakash, J.) Patna High Court, Patna Dated, the 21st August, 2013 NAFR/S.Ali

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial