Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Aditya Singh and ors Vs. State and ors

Aditya Singh and ors vs State and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided Aug 30, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1028413

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Aditya Singh and ors

Respondent

State and ors

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna civil writ jurisdiction case no.6655 of 1992 =========================================================== 1. aditya singh 2. vishwanath singh 3. suryanath singh, all sons of ram sewak singh, resident of village- mashadiya, p.s. rajpur, district- buxar. .... .... petitioner/s versus 1. the state of bihar through director, consolidation, bihar, patna.2. joint director consolidation, bihar, patna.3. rajnath singh 4. sivnath singh 5. rajnarayan singh, all resident of village- mashadiya, p.s. rajpur, district- buxar. .... .... respondent/s =========================================================== appearance : for the petitioner/s : mr. anant bijay singh for the respondent no.1 & 2 : mr. rajesh kumar verma, sc- 27 mr. r. k. sharma, ac to sc-27 for the respondent no. 3 to 5: mr. ras bihari thakur =========================================================== coram: honourable mr. justice birendra prasad verma oral judgment date:30. 08-2013 by the impugned order dated 17.06.1992 (annexure-1) passed in consolidation revision no. 1207 of 1989 by the respondent joint director of consolidation (headquarter), patna, draft consolidation scheme regarding allotment of chaks to the raiyats has been directed to be restored. after having heard the parties and going through the record as also on perusal of the impugned revisional order dated 17.06.1992 (annexure-1), this court does not find any legal infirmity or procedural irregularity warranting any interference by this court in exercise of powers under article 226 of the constitution of india. in the result, the writ petition has to fail and is, accordingly, dismissed. no costs. (birendra prasad verma, j) btiwary/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6655 of 1992 =========================================================== 1. Aditya Singh 2. Vishwanath Singh 3. Suryanath Singh, all sons of Ram Sewak Singh, resident of Village- Mashadiya, P.S. Rajpur, District- Buxar. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Director, Consolidation, Bihar, Patna.

2. Joint Director Consolidation, Bihar, Patna.

3. Rajnath Singh 4. Sivnath Singh 5. Rajnarayan Singh, all resident of Village- Mashadiya, P.S. Rajpur, District- Buxar. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anant Bijay Singh For the Respondent No.1 & 2 : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Verma, SC- 27 Mr. R. K. Sharma, AC to SC-27 For the Respondent No. 3 to 5: Mr. Ras Bihari Thakur =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL JUDGMENT

Date:

30. 08-2013 By the impugned order dated 17.06.1992 (Annexure-1) passed in Consolidation Revision No. 1207 of 1989 by the respondent Joint Director of Consolidation (Headquarter), Patna, draft consolidation scheme regarding allotment of chaks to the raiyats has been directed to be restored. After having heard the parties and going through the record as also on perusal of the impugned revisional order dated 17.06.1992 (Annexure-1), this Court does not find any legal infirmity or procedural irregularity warranting any interference by this Court in exercise of powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. In the result, the writ petition has to fail and is, accordingly, dismissed. No costs. (Birendra Prasad Verma, J) BTiwary/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial